A history of the top marginal tax rates on the wealthiest Americans:

1940: 81%
1950: 84%
1960: 91%
1970: 72%
1980: 70%
1990: 28%
2000: 40%
2010: 35%

For 50 years, corporate backed politicians in Congress have slashed taxes to line the pockets of their wealthy donors.

@rbreich you can really see how Reagan, the daft bastard, ruined everything (well... Him and Thatcher).
@rbreich I like to use these visuals to demonstrate how badly we've screwed things up since the Nixon years:
@rbreich The average tax rate over the 70 years is 62-63%. For now, I’d totally settle for the average.
@rbreich @artesianspring Our tax rate was about 22% forever. Then came the #GOPTaxScam and suddenly we owe $7200 a year more.
@rbreich This is the slow, deliberate destruction of American democracy to suit the greed of a minority.
@rbreich In 1980 the trickle down myth was introduced to the public. By 1990 it was economic policy. Its the most massive long con ever conceived and its still paying off to this day.

@rbreich
And then there are deductions and loopholes that reduce their taxes so much that Warren Buffett, for example, pays a lower tax rate than his secretary.

In 2008, top 400 richest Americans (income > $110,000,000) paid only 18% of their income in income taxes.

#BuffettRule

https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/Buffett_Rule_Report_Final.pdf

@kegill @rbreich Which is also a big problem even at the current 35% if they actually PAID that, things would be different. Heck, if even paid the 1990 28% there would be a lot more money to go around.
@legalquilts @kegill @rbreich exactly. Effective and paid are VERY different.

@kegill @rbreich

He probably also pays a lower rate than his accountant, and the accountant is the *one who calculates that*. I wonder how the accountant feels about paying a larger tax rate than their boss?

@kegill @rbreich Which illustrates how nonsense @rbreich's point is. 😂

@rbreich

REPOST

A history of the top marginal tax rates on the wealthiest Americans:

1940: 81%
1950: 84%
1960: 91%
1970: 72%
1980: 70%
1990: 28%
2000: 40%
2010: 35%

For 50 years, corporate backed politicians in Congress have slashed taxes to line the pockets of their wealthy donors.

MY COMMENT

This is all you need to know about politics. See how well Nixon & Reagan killed the Middle Class with their TRICKLE DOWN voodoo economics.

@rbreich
It should be pointed out that the US was at the zenith of its economic and military clout when the top rate was at 90%.

@rbreich What is the effective tax rate they paid?

If someone was taxing me 90%, I'd be buying politicians & judges, too.

@HarryCallahan
Do you understand what *marginal* tax rate means? They aren't having all of their income taxed at that rate, just the top margin of it.

@rbreich

@gayasamundo @rbreich I completely understand. My two points:

1. What actual, effective tax rate did they pay? Compare it to the effective rate the rest of us pay. Mine's around 15%. The rich might be 1%-5%. Your's is likely different.

2. 70% plus tax rates seem absurd to me. Why would the government be entitled to more than half your income? How hard would you work for diminishing returns?

We need a simple & fair tax code free of loopholes w/effective enforcement & aggressive collection.

@HarryCallahan @gayasamundo @rbreich over a certain threshold 70%+ is perfectly reasonable. We could have healthcare and education paid for. Instead we have 1% hoarding all the money.
@gayasamundo @HarryCallahan @rbreich yup. And everything over $100 million should be a 100% tax rate. Wealth hoarding and wage theft should be illegal.
@rbreich Americans are suffering to just nuy food. This is so a ridiculous. We need better people in politics.
@rbreich Top federal marginal tax is 37% today. California adds 13.3% on top of that for a total of 50.3%.
@rbreich Where in this timeline do the "Make America Great Again" folks want to go? Because it seems like a good, healthy system of taxation leveled the playing field and enabled the American Dream (all while investing in the country and keeping national debt manageable). 🤔
@rbreich and in the 50's & 60's we had the most stable economy in us history. people were able to save money instead of going into debt. "father knows best" is an illusion, look at movies, music, poetry, books. when feeling economically safe---people challenged s.q. and appreciated others rights---one place that didn't happen--am. south. and union blocking led to resistance to change
@UnUtopianOptimist @rbreich We also had a top tax rate of 90% and income inequality was nowhere near todays levels. The debt was manageable and CEO’s made ten times what workers made. That CEO is now making 399 times an average worker now.
@CivilityFan i do remember those days. unions were strong in my area country, and being a nutcake and never liking having extra money I would drive up to chicago and gather up the poor living on the street and load them in my woody and take them to gino's pizza. then i could usually afford to put up 10 or 12 in a $5 a night motel. I was stupid, I guess cause i struggle now in retirement. it changed in the 70's when prices raise and my foundry shut down.
@UnUtopianOptimist Would argue that for most of us, it changed in the 80’s. There was inflation during Carter, but everyone got hurt by it. When Reagan re-engineered the tax code, it disproportionately hit poor and working folks. A glance at the tables that depict inequality show how poverty and social equity were on the rise from soon after LBJ’s Great Society legislation passed until It reversed with Reagan’s Trickle Down economics that shifted the majority of wealth to the top 1%. Reagan was the personification of evil and if there is an afterlife, I’m sure he is in hell
@rbreich read your bio here. A stoic, a deist, a taoist. I've never been as fortunate or as unfortunate, but never needed much. Father inherited a bit from his second wife---i asked to be removed from the will because i had to attachment. sometimes i regret, i would have liked giving it others, but i think they had the will set up to prevent that. i just don't understand why i need to have more than i have.

@rbreich This helps explain the obvious and rapid rise in inequality in the US.

It's tempting to say this also explains how the US was able to afford the Space Race and the Cold War but that isn't exactly how taxes work #mmt

@rbreich and now the american dream is to leave the country.
@rbreich It’s called the Robin Hood syndrome, steel from the rich and give to the poor, which created tax optimization and tax avoidance.
@rbreich
This applies to both dominant parties, which is indicative of a government in service of the wealthy. Unfortunately, Trump at al, have found a way to befuddle the masses, including working class, by playing the nationalistic trump card.
@rbreich
At least in this single regard I can agree with the red hats: make America(n taxes) great again
@rbreich So the MONEY didn’t “trickle down,” just the tax rates for the rich…
@rbreich but just as big a problem is the Capital Gains tax. ALL income, whether from earnings (work) or investments should be taxed the same!!!
@rbreich they tell you it’s trickle down policies, but what they don’t want you to know is that the opposite reigns true. IT’S RAINING UP!

@rbreich

___D O E S N ' T___M A K E___A___D I F F E R E N C E___

... how much is the tax income of the state

because the state already takes in trillions

the problem is that the money doesn't reach downwards to the weaker half of the population

u need free items (especially sleeping place)

only then things get alright

thus u're all wrong, demanding more taxes, while being incompetent in efficiently sending the money to the sufferers

@rbreich and if there were any doubts about who rules the world, this says it all. Concisely, precisely, exactly.