Just realized that most people talking to me about Bluesky don't know about DIDs, don't care, and are clueless about its benefits.
And this is a big problem for Bluesky because that's the one thing that AT protocol has over ActivityPub.
Just realized that most people talking to me about Bluesky don't know about DIDs, don't care, and are clueless about its benefits.
And this is a big problem for Bluesky because that's the one thing that AT protocol has over ActivityPub.
For better or worse, Mastodon has spent the past 6 months educating newbies about the benefits of decentralization -- and now we're all able to have a discussion about it.
Folks on Bluesky are still oblivious about decentralization, don't know that Bluesky is supposed to be a decentralized service -- and might not react well when other servers start to federate with it.
Today, I had a Bluesky user try to defend Bluesky’s Terms of Service regarding account termination because they said it’s par for the course with Google and Facebook.
Except Bluesky’s not supposed to own your account! AT protocol is supposed to make your ID a separate concern from the server you use!
When I told them this, they said, “Oh, that’s just marketing!”
Wow! Even a Bluesky fan doesn’t believe in DIDs—he thinks it’s too fantastic!
However, I don’t. I want it to have mass adoption.
I think everyone who looks over AT protocol agrees that Bluesky’s approach to decentralized identity is unique and interesting.
You may disagree with how they go about it, but at least the approach is unique and interesting.
But try explaining what it does in plain language.
@atomicpoet an attempt: It decouples your identity from your home instance, so now new users have to find both a home instance and a home identity provider instance.
(In the end it becomes a key management problem of course, and I don't expect any service that forces normal users to do key management to reach wide adoption)
@atomicpoet
TBH, the whole approach feels a bit like "You can operate your own server on your own dime, but we still control who can be a user".
Either because they control the creation of DIDs, control the "lookup" infrastructure or because they provide additional important services that only work with an official™️ DID.
Like reinventing the Internet but owning the DNS.
And then test whether they can migrate their account off Bluesky in order to delete it
It's gonna be like when Google tried merging YouTube and G+ identities/comment feeds
Pre-G+ Youtubers did not react well
https://youtu.be/6L_m8AzSPCM