@EposVox As an addendum to this: most authors are not only genuinely delighted to share their work with you if you request it, some are even moreso delighted to talk to you about it and answer questions!

Especially if they have additional knowledge or information worth sharing that they didn't include in the original paper!

@EposVox such an excellent point I could always email the author for the 📜🗞️
@EposVox don't most people use sci hub?
@tia6o @EposVox big publishers are busy playing whack-a-mole with scihub domains, so if you want any particular paper mailing the authors is always an option.
@tia6o @EposVox Depends on the field. Math and physics will be arXiv
@EposVox As the author or co-author of various scientific papers: don’t I know it. AND, you have to pay them a publishing fee if they accept your paper AND the scientists who review the papers (which I have also done) are also unpaid. Huge racket.
@cgquarterly @EposVox but i don't really understand... If nobody Pays them... How do they get money for their living expenses?
@SleepyHeadBensh @EposVox Someone puts out a call for grant proposals. We submit one and are awarded the grant. That pays for us to do the research, which once completed is sent to the grant-awarding institution. We then write a paper in which we are the authors and the grant-awarders are credited. The paper is published by a journal who puts it behind a paywall so that they cam profit from it, while paying nothing to either us or the grant-provider.
@EposVox
I just learned something new. Thank you!
@EposVox All the more reason to look for diamond #openaccess journals to publish with, like most journals with library publishers. Check out https://doaj.org for those and more.
Directory of Open Access Journals – DOAJ

DOAJ is a unique and extensive index of diverse open access journals from around the world, driven by a growing community, committed to ensuring quality content is freely available online for everyone.

@EposVox I've full on blocked news sites on my home network before because they insisted on making me pay to read it. Now they've lost the money AND the traffic as a result
@EposVox Or just pirate them!

@EposVox Wait, what even is the purpose of these journals in the age of the internet?

Are you seriously paying to have a PDF put on a website?

@almaember @EposVox In theory you're paying for curation, their selection of the paper should be a quality signal. In practice, their business model is highly outdated and it can be done much more efficiently and cheaper

@almaember @EposVox

In all honesty? Serve as intermediaries to maximize profits by exploiting the labor AND money of scientists. 🤑

It's a cartel, pure and simple.

@almaember @EposVox they only bring prestigious places to have your paper published in.
All the rest is done free of charge by researchers, except for the editing sometimes.
If you get rid of some marketing and fancy websites, which we don't really need, all of this is done better by scientific societies for a fraction of the price.
@almaember @EposVox It's mostly about prestige. If you have your PDF put on a website by @Nature, you'll probably gain many citations. Peer review is another factor, but the quality varies greatly.
@EposVox yes. Authors pay the publishers to get their papers published and readers pay the publishers to read
@EposVox oh, wow! I really wish I had known this. I frequently have to search out "alternative sources" for papers. Just asking the author sounds better for everyone!
@EposVox: The relevant hashtag, once popularised on the bird site that's now pining for the fjords, is #ICanHazPDF.

A question was asked elsewhere:

> What's something that seems obvious within your profession, but the general public seems to misunderstand?

@EposVox re-tooted one interesting answer to this. Thanks! See this post's thread.

For my own answer:

New mathematics is being created all the time.

(I was a research Mathematician some time ago and loved it.)

@EposVox Not to mention that authors generally have to pay the publisher as well, while peer reviewers work as volunteers without getting paid.
@EposVox It is upsetting that ResearchGate demands university affiliation, since that is the easiest way to email researchers with these requests.
@[email protected]
Elbakyan is a schizoid sperg (who thinks that Stalin is literally god) but she does a great job maintaining sci-hub 
@EposVox To be fair publishing is a lot of work, and includes copy editing and other things that do add value. I have family that works in publishing and some articles need tons of polish. They also pay for hosting for open access articles which any author can opt-in to (for an added fee sometimes)
@EposVox and we do. Sometimes the authors never respond to emails. As a self employed, independent researcher it’s a challenge digging sometime.
@EposVox I never even considered this. There are so many papers I never read because they were behind a paywall that was unaffordable for a school paper. But I always thought the authors were paid from those fees, not that all of it went to the publisher. Do they get compensated at all for publishing?
@EposVox Does this include curious laypeople who have nothing to offer in terms of exposure? I hit a lot of paywalls trying to read papers just out of curiosity :(
@AngryYukkuri Without speaking for anyone else, I personally love it when laypeople want to read my articles
@EposVox I love to share my work & know others are interested in it!
@EposVox I'm no academic, but from what I read, academic publishing is a huge scam. From how they review them to access, to even getting published. All the money seems to flow to a single point.
@EposVox have you heard of PRINCIPIA? It’s a decentralized academic publishing framework! I actually just wrote about it on my medium blog if you want to check it out: https://oceanexplains.medium.com/principia-a-novel-decentralized-academic-publishing-framework-196996e4f3d8
PRINCIPIA: Decentralized Academic Publishing | Medium

Ocean Explains - PRINCIPIA, the novel decentralized academic publishing framework that could disrupt academia and at last raze the ivory tower.

Medium
@EposVox Can confirm. I've done this a few times and have never been turned down.
@EposVox Love this! New standard operating procedure for me.
@EposVox I've heard this information before, but how would you suggest wording that you want access to the paper? I know it doesn't need to be 100% professional, but a teensy guide would help for my times of deep research
@EposVox And you get to email cool people. So win/win.
@EposVox this needs to@be known
@EposVox Find them on https://www.researchgate.net/ and you can send a request directly to the author.
ResearchGate | Find and share research

Access 160+ million publications and connect with 25+ million researchers. Join for free and gain visibility by uploading your research.

ResearchGate
@EposVox There is no greater scam in the world than academic publishing. These companies are certified bottom-feeders.
@EposVox Or just publish your papers on Arxiv
@EposVox my phd supervisor told me it was rude to email an author directly. Plus it shows that you work at a bad university because apparently it could not afford a subscription.
He is a psychology professor now. That guy was so dumb and socially awkward.
Had so many delightful email conversations based on asking for papers! It is a good advice!
@EposVox when I was young researchers used to publish unedited draft on their website.
@EposVox This was, of course, entirely standard practice until about 20 years ago, when something happened, and it almost fell out of use entirely. What happened? I'm not really sure, despite having worked in the sector.
@EposVox Who pays for the peer review process?

@TimWardCam @EposVox no one. It’s organized by senior researchers acting as volunteer editors (okay - sometimes they get like, a marginal amount of money from the publisher) / program committee members, and the reviews are also done by volunteers, usually the same people that author papers

who the publishers will in fact happily charge large amounts of money to publish “open access”, while still charging for subscriptions for mixed open access and not journals, all for hosting a pdf

@TimWardCam @EposVox (publishers do often claim that they do copy editing. i’ve never seem them do that except for, if they do produce a print version, putting ads in the print version because yes, of course they would do that, because why double dip when you can triple dip selling a thing made using labor you didn’t pay for)
@EposVox 🙏thank you for this