Dear journalists, please stop referring to Mastodon as “Web3”.

While Mastodon is decentralized, it doesn’t utilize blockchain or token-based economics.

While you may believe this buzzword makes you sound smart to readers, it really just generates confusion.

https://eandt.theiet.org/content/articles/2023/04/social-networks-face-the-wisdom-of-crowds/

@fediversenews

Social networks face the wisdom of crowds

Web3 promises a new world of social media where you are the boss. The problem? You are now the boss.

@atomicpoet @fediversenews It seems to me that "Web3" is beginning to mean much more than the narrow blockchain-based definition that the crypto bros originally gave it. As a catch-all term for all things decentralised, I don't mind it
@Stewart @Chris Trottier Originally, in mainstream media, #Metaverse referred to Zuckerberg's #HorizonWorlds because nobody except Neal Stephenson, his readers, the #OpenSimulator community and a select few others had heard that word before. For some media outlets, it still does.

#Web30 referred to what would follow on the heels of "Facebook's Metaverse" using blockchains, cryptocurrencies and NFTs as something allegedly essential and inevitable in the creation and operation of #VirtualWorlds. In other, fewer words: get-rich-quick schemes. Probably not few of them went under in the crypto crash, especially those that relied on existing currencies.

Unfortunately, neither mainstream media nor tech media nor their audience could hear the #SecondLife and #OpenSim users laugh. Since people believe the former shut down before spring 2009, and almost nobody has ever heard of the latter, the cryptobros can continue implying that blockchain, crypto and NFTs are absolute necessities for virtual worlds.
Netzgemeinde/Hubzilla

@yourfootmyface @atomicpoet @fediversenews they've already poisoned it, they can keep it
@atomicpoet
OTOH I do find it a little funny that the Web3 crowd so badly failed to link the buzzword up with the blockchain that now some journalists are using it for the #fediverse, which is in some ways almost its inverse.
@fediversenews
@atomicpoet @fediversenews The W3C says there is no such thing as Web3 https://w3c.social/@w3c/109836177272710553
World Wide Web Consortium (@[email protected])

Do you know why you won't find any mention anywhere on the W3C website of #web3? It does not exist. BOOM! There is one web.

w3c.social
@atomicpoet @fediversenews it’s not even web – twitter and mastodon are apps
@atomicpoet @fediversenews Besides, eny fule kno it am Web 3 point Oh!
@atomicpoet @fediversenews It's also "decentralized" in a way that it has no single centre. Not in a way it's permissionless and trustless.

@atomicpoet @fediversenews I think web3 is just referring to the evolution of the internet away from centralised corporations serving and holding your data.

Crypto people thought blockchains would accomplish this but maybe federated networks will be the ones to do it. And maybe blockchains still have a place there too... 🤓

@atomicpoet @fediversenews Or as we like to say, "It's a load of old bollocks".
@atomicpoet @fediversenews the irony is also in how few of those ‘decentralized’ project do their shilling outside of centralized platforms.
@jmalone @atomicpoet @fediversenews It's on here if you know where to look for it. Admittedly "Mastodon" is pretty hostile to cryptocurrency/nft/"web3". @10grans has been here since like 2018 and @randomencounter since 2020 (since retired.) it wasn't even possible to play randomencounter on mastodon because of the lack of features like emoji reacts so it never caught on on this side of the network but for a while 10grans was pretty popular.
@atomicpoet @fediversenews posted from my phone, which says '5G' in the signal bar, but is using what is essentially 4G for data and entirely 4G for operational network functions.
@DarcMoughty @atomicpoet @[email protected] 5G has serious problems, and only few people use it. Just stick to 4G for now. Rural areas will stick to 4G as only urban areas have 5G masts.
@ahriboy @atomicpoet @fediversenews I live in the city. I typically get 4G speeds on a nominally '5G' connection, but the 'real' 5G works fine when I'm a stone's throw from one of the access points. I got 440Mbps to my phone a few weeks ago... which is cool, but sorta useless to me (very useful for the telco though, since now they can support more density).

@ahriboy @atomicpoet @DarcMoughty @fediversenews I think it would be better to say it would be a waste of money to go out of your way to upgrade your hardware for 5G

Actually avoiding it when you have the hardware for it is just pain for no reason (it's fine when you have it, it's just useless)

@igrok @atomicpoet @DarcMoughty @[email protected] 5G plans are absolutely expensive. I watched the Mrwhosetheboss video again and I stayed with 4G.

@ahriboy Interesting, I didn't even know some providers were charging more for it. My plan doesn't have a 5G tier, you just pay your bill and get whatever service & signal your device can use best.

It's sort of silly to charge customers for 5G; the marginal cost of people using it should be significantly lower than 4G. I'm guessing providers charging more for it are riding the hype wave to soak as much money up from people who think they need it, when it's actually the telco companies that need people to switch over.

@ahriboy @atomicpoet @DarcMoughty @fediversenews wow, who is/where are they doing that?!

Maybe they're aware it's all hype and are tired of customers pushing for it, so they're trying to price it out of the market? Lol, if only...

@igrok there *is* a lot of hype, but there's also a legitimate reason we need it. What's going on is that the telcos are pitching us 'faster amazing new stuff' and pitching policymakers on 'transformative information economy enablement' which are both bullshit.

The truth isn't that I need 400mbps to my phone, car, or IoT things; a few Mbps is enough for all those things to work just fine. It's the telcos that need to be able to support all the smartphones, cars with telemetry, IoT street lights, etc. without throttling everyone.

@ahriboy @atomicpoet @DarcMoughty @fediversenews @igrok Where is this?
Here (UK) I get 5G pretty much everywhere, except out in the countryside where it will drop to 4G. When I’ve measured the speed it’s usually faster than my home fibre connection. And there’s no such thing as a 4G plan. Everyone gets 5G as standard (if your phone is capable).
I’m paying £15 a month for unlimited calls/texts, 30GB data 5G, better deals exist.
@MetalSamurai I can't speak to where others live, but the USA has absolutely giant swaths of middle-low density (US portion of people living in flats is about half of UK), and most people aren't very close to the 'really fast 5G'.
@atomicpoet @fediversenews so much for the freedom of speech Twitter says it defends.
@atomicpoet @fediversenews #Usenet predates Web 1.0 and was already decentralized.
@atomicpoet @fediversenews The world would be a better place if Mastodon and its philosophy of decentralization was the Web3 bandwagon everyone was writing about, rather than crypto bank schemes and token grifts pushed by celebrities.
@atomicpoet @fediversenews Maybe I’m just cynical, but this doesn’t seem like an innocent act of confusion. Rather a purposeful ploy to keep “Web3” relevant.
@atomicpoet @fediversenews and in terms of advancement, it's definitely more like Web6 or 7.
@atomicpoet @fediversenews web3 will always mean decentralized to me.
@atomicpoet @fediversenews All your posts are always on point.
@atomicpoet
We have to keep repeating & emphasizing that the operative word in Fediverse is federation; decentralization is incidental. OTOH, Web3 stops at being decentralized (to be generous); federation has never been an objective.
@fediversenews
@atomicpoet @fediversenews run from anyone using the phrase "web3". It's hollow, undefined buzzword dribble.

@atomicpoet

I'd propose "It's web1.1", used by people that avoid ".0" versions ;)

@fediversenews

@atomicpoet
The term web3 has been around for 15 years. It used to be the semantic web that we never really got.
I always hated that the crypto-idiots claimed that term for themselves. I would not let them have it.
@fediversenews @aral
@claudius @atomicpoet @fediversenews @aral Yeah, I'm not a fan of "the semantic web" or crypto-scams. Using "Web3" for the fediverse is a way of retconning the crypto-mistake!

@atomicpoet @fediversenews @IronCurtain I hear you, but the way I see it, the only ones who lose anything by “web3” becoming a confusing term are the cryptobros.

Perhaps we can take this opportunity to completely obliterate the original meaning of “web3” and have it permanently disconnected from crypto. I wouldn’t mind that.