Reminiscing on when I pissed off venture capitalists with an offhand remark on Crypto Critics' Corner that VCs are not good for society with a new essay about the meltdown around Silicon Valley Bank: https://newsletter.mollywhite.net/p/the-venture-capitalists-dilemma
The venture capitalist's dilemma

The embarrassing investor meltdown surrounding Silicon Valley Bank should drive us to consider new models.

Molly White

I'm not venture capital-funded, so consider subscribing if you like my writing. 🥰

https://newsletter.mollywhite.net/subscribe/

Subscribe to Molly White

Tens of thousands of subscribers. Comprehensible coverage of the cryptocurrency industry and the broader technology world. Click to read Molly White, a Substack publication.

The clip is from episode 84: "Cryptocurrency Criticism in a Down Market", around 19 minutes in.
https://youtu.be/k4o86dEDGRo?t=1128
Cryptocurrency Criticism in a Down Market (feat. Molly White) - Episode 84

YouTube
guess this is where I find out if any VCs subscribe to my newsletter lol
@molly0xfff I laughed and laughed at this bit:
@molly0xfff
Not anymore 🤣🤣🤣😎🤣🤣
@molly0xfff *looks around nervously* Maybe one or two VC employees subscribe, and don’t find much to argue with…
@molly0xfff If you were using a platform other than Substack, I'd have subscribed a long time ago. But I can't ethically subscribe to anything on Substack. ☹️
@jeridansky @molly0xfff why not? Where else are independent writers producing articles? Medium i suppose, maybe Patreon?
@molly0xfff There should private deposit insurance that organizations like these could purchase for their full deposit. Then the government wouldn’t have to bail them out.
@michaelgemar @molly0xfff What makes you think they would make use of that?
@Teskariel @molly0xfff They would if they were either mandated to, or if it was explicit policy to not provide bailouts to uninsured accounts. (I’ll grant there’s an initial chicken-or-egg problem — until it’s clearly needed it won’t be used, and it won’t be available until companies use it.)

@molly0xfff

This is really excellent. I hope your post gets widely distributed, as it's more broadly accessible than your usual posts about crypto (IMO, being not particularly knowledgeable about crypto nor economics myself).

@molly0xfff Very good! A lot of this goes back to the mid to late 1920's, with Milton Friedman and the Chicago School, and their idea that businesses should only answer to their shareholders:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milton_Friedman

Freidman also assumed investors are rational (as we see, they are not).

Freidman also completely forgot about what happens when there is no regulation and the leaders take control - they ignored what happened during the Guilded Age (1870-1920s, IIRC). They failed U.S. History.

Milton Friedman - Wikipedia

@molly0xfff they I always wonder about VC, if a government fund or incubator would yield the same results
@mcole @molly0xfff Isn't all about the long term decision making? Real innovation, that really makes sense, takes time. Most of the stuff I am seeing is hype.
How long until people realize that for example AI is just the same shit in a different color?

@mcole @molly0xfff
There are actually quite a few of them, and they vary in size and scale.

Famously, the Energy Policy Act of 2005 there was a loan program setup to fund clean energy technology development. It had a high profile failure in Solyndra, but also quite a few successes, and a default rate under 3%.

DOE still has several incubator programs (all around energy).

There are others spread across the Federal Government, though none I am aware of focused on general tech.

@molly0xfff people don’t hate tech. People hate Zuckface, Phony Stark, and money people who think they must be tech because they paid for it. If it were 1987 they’d all be dealing junk bonds for KKR instead.
@molly0xfff excellent article, clearsighted and with very precise deployment of ridicule
Thanks for sharing, Molly! I'm a long-time listener of the ALL-IN podcast, and have to say I found your critique relevant and funny!
@molly0xfff
I think feds were right to release funds to depositors quickly because the bank had enough to cover like 80-90%, right? No reason to wait for the wheels of bureaucracy to turn. But I don't understand why they made everyone whole.

@molly0xfff I totally agree with everything you say.

But I think if we want to progress, it may be worth pointing out (as a few already do) that the VC class has not even been doing good to capital. They have not been good investments for their LPs. And we may want to start asking the LPs why they keep funding them despite the impact and the negative returns.

@molly0xfff Boosting the heck out of this. Clear, precise take down of why it’s the billionaire VCs who are despised, not the “tech industry”.

Innovation is not a massive exit payoff for funds that were already impossibly rich to start with. If they did something worthwhile for society, they’d become appreciated.

@molly0xfff all these Silicon Valley boys trying to fix the World but not realising one of the big problems facing Humanity is them.
@molly0xfff "privatizing profit while socializing loss" really conveys A LOT of badthink very succinctly. A great description.
@molly0xfff your best yet - really clear and thorough analysis of the SVB debacle. I liked how you grudgingly admit that fdic insurance *cough*bailout*cough* was probably needed, but pointing out the hypocrisy and deliberate, bad faith machinations that drove us to this cliff edge.
@molly0xfff This may be my favorite story yet that you've posted. Well written and the David and Jason dilemma was brilliant.