I'm not venture capital-funded, so consider subscribing if you like my writing. 🥰
@bigfishrunning For starters:
https://thehypothesis.substack.com/p/heres-why-substacks-scam-worked-so
https://mashable.com/article/substack-covid-misinformation
https://mastodon.social/@jhpot/109604889214426745
https://mastodon.social/@ricmac/109596194828135932
https://me.dm/@anildash/109891943225094233
Here are alternatives: https://www.wired.com/story/best-substack-alternatives/
I'm OK with Patreon, too; I support about 9 efforts that way.
This is really excellent. I hope your post gets widely distributed, as it's more broadly accessible than your usual posts about crypto (IMO, being not particularly knowledgeable about crypto nor economics myself).
@molly0xfff Very good! A lot of this goes back to the mid to late 1920's, with Milton Friedman and the Chicago School, and their idea that businesses should only answer to their shareholders:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milton_Friedman
Freidman also assumed investors are rational (as we see, they are not).
Freidman also completely forgot about what happens when there is no regulation and the leaders take control - they ignored what happened during the Guilded Age (1870-1920s, IIRC). They failed U.S. History.
@mcole @molly0xfff
There are actually quite a few of them, and they vary in size and scale.
Famously, the Energy Policy Act of 2005 there was a loan program setup to fund clean energy technology development. It had a high profile failure in Solyndra, but also quite a few successes, and a default rate under 3%.
DOE still has several incubator programs (all around energy).
There are others spread across the Federal Government, though none I am aware of focused on general tech.
@molly0xfff I totally agree with everything you say.
But I think if we want to progress, it may be worth pointing out (as a few already do) that the VC class has not even been doing good to capital. They have not been good investments for their LPs. And we may want to start asking the LPs why they keep funding them despite the impact and the negative returns.
@molly0xfff Boosting the heck out of this. Clear, precise take down of why it’s the billionaire VCs who are despised, not the “tech industry”.
Innovation is not a massive exit payoff for funds that were already impossibly rich to start with. If they did something worthwhile for society, they’d become appreciated.