I rarely post about Musk & #Twitter, but I am currently writing a dissertation related to the spread of misinformation.
This is not true. ⬇️
I rarely post about Musk & #Twitter, but I am currently writing a dissertation related to the spread of misinformation.
This is not true. ⬇️
Since some folks are interested in my research, you can keep up with literature I’ve been reading & related stories on my substack: https://sheril.substack.com/p/do-facts-matter
The manuscripts won’t be out for some time, but here’s a bit more on the motivation behind my dissertation: https://open.substack.com/pub/sheril/p/a-dissertation-on-democracy?utm_source=direct&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web /2
A critical topic of real value.
Thank you for sharing your insightful thoughts and observations regarding whether facts matter. From your article, I understand that information processing by our minds is influenced by goals, emotions, preexisting beliefs and culture. Our inferences will not change just based on raw facts.
What can change our informed decision making process? From my personal experience I see that facts or apparent facts driven by extreme external circumstances (e.g. business, finance etc.) and deep rooted emotional triggers can challenge our preexisting beliefs and modify our information channels. It seems that changing our bias and worldview doesn’t necessarily mean changing our belief about something. We will always continue to believe what we think is right for us.
As aptly mentioned here, the goal is not to change our belief but to create space for other people to have different perspectives. It is essential that we listen actively, ask questions respectfully, acknowledge differences without judgment or blame, and seek common ground wherever possible.
#Facts #Mind #Harmony #Perspectives #Respect
cc: @srijit
@GungJoe @Tweetfiction @Sheril
From the Portland (Maine) Gazette, September 5, 1820: "Falsehood will fly from Maine to Georgia, while truth is pulling her boots on."
Or as Jonathan Swift explained perfectly in The Examiner in 1710:
"Few lies carry the inventor’s mark, and the most prostitute enemy to truth, may spread a thousand without being known for the author: besides, as the vilest writer has his readers, so the greatest liar has his believers: and it often happens, that if a lie be believed only for an hour, it has done its work, and there is no farther occasion for it. Falsehood flies, and truth comes limping after it; so that when men come to be undeceived, it is too late; the jest is over, and the tale has had its effect: like a man, who has thought of a good repartee, when the discourse is changed, or the company parted; or like a physician, who has found out an infallible medicine, after the patient is dead."
(Both found here: https://interestingliterature.com/2021/06/lie-halfway-round-world-before-truth-boots-on-quote-origin-meaning/ )
In this week’s Dispatches from The Secret Library, Dr Oliver Tearle explores the surprising origins of that ‘a lie is halfway round the world …’ quotation ‘A lie is halfway round the world before t…
"the more we see something repeated, the more likely we are to believe it to be true.”
Thread about the “Illusory Truth Effect” and why it is so important NOT to repeat lies on social media (or elsewhere), even with the intention of debunking them.
https://newsie.social/@ZhiZhu/109530716627287778
#Propaganda #Disinformation #Misinformation #Lies #Journalism
Attached: 1 image · Content warning: Why do our brains believe lies?
That is a multidimensional post!
@Sheril these people: https://www.theskepticsguide.org
PS
Can't wait to read your research!
@matejpp But will it undo the damage of the misinformation? No.
That’s exactly the point. Once the misinformation cat is out the of the bag, it’s very hard to stop. You can spew rivers of lies and people are left scrambling trying to deal with all of them, transparent as they may be to most.
Not to play down your research (and it's important to research things even if they seem obvious) but I think it ought to be ... obvious that these have different impacts.
Scenario 1
Some Rando: "I was abducted by aliens."
Trusted Source: "There is no evidence to support this and it's likely false."
Scenario 2
** nothing **
In which are we now debating the aliens, however unlikely?
Ethically speaking, his statement is correct.
However most people don't really want the truth, they just want constant reassurance that what they believe is the truth.
I mean a NAZI for example will listen how he/she is special before sparing a second to listen why Humans are all the same s*.
@Sheril As much as I am repulsed by this man and his actions, I tend to agree with his assertion here.
Censorship of *opinions* (as opposed to calls for violence, etc) is unconstitutional in many parts of the world.
So from a legal standpoint, the only way to deal with misinformation is information. Accurate, unbiased reporting of facts—not opinions—from reputed sources.
I’d like to read your dissertation, if you could kindly link it here.
Which works of Reichsminister für Volksaufklärung und Propaganda und Präsident der Reichskulturkammer Josef Goebbels are you covering apart from the Sportpalast speech?
You are probably using "The Official German Report
Nazi Penetration, 1924-1942, Oetje John Rogge (1961)? - A personal copy is hard to come by.
Are you using other materials to cover the biggest disinformation campaign in US history of George Sylvester Viereck? (well maybe #TFG's tweets and press releases, which had...
...global reach, whereas Viereck's campaign targeted only US citizens. ;))
How about the global anti-vaxxer movement (e.g. https://www.bbc.com/news/health-48585036) - I read during the beginning of the pandemic that the "scientific proof" could apparently be traced back to just half a dozen (or so) articles.
Basically go with the opposite of what musk, trump or boris johnson say - that's almost scientifically going to be the truth
@Sheril Naturally, when owning a social media platform, inviting misinformation in and letting many others try to fight that fast-typed misinformation with hard-collected facts equals the sought engagement, not caring if good or bad.
No wonder Elon sits next to Rupert during some sports event, it is them sharing a hobby and trading ideas.
@Sheril So, uhm, recently he posted the following "gem":
"In the months ahead, we will use AI to detect & highlight manipulation of public opinion on this platform."
@Sheril Yes, there's just one or very limited amount of accurate but unlimited inaccurate information.
He fails on basic math, I'd say.