Federal authorities are seriously considering protecting all uninsured deposits at Silicon Valley Bank
With your tax dollars
Here’s my proposal: fuck you, no.
Claw back the bonuses SVB gave staff HOURS before the collapse. Then we can talk.
Federal authorities are seriously considering protecting all uninsured deposits at Silicon Valley Bank
With your tax dollars
Here’s my proposal: fuck you, no.
Claw back the bonuses SVB gave staff HOURS before the collapse. Then we can talk.
@chrisU @flexghost If they keep this shit up it may not be "with my tax dollars" for long.
Millions of others would also probably go on a tax strike.
@miarosa758 @flexghost @chrisU
Brave you say??
@flexghost No bank bailout consideration until AFTER student loans are forgiven.
It took me over 25 years to pay off my student loans. I wouldn't wish that on anyone.
@flexghost Something about repubs, they are born on 3rd base and think they hit a homer. No. Repubs had every advantage or if they did not, like Paul Ryan, they insist on pulling up the ladder so no one but the rich can advance.
For the uninitiated, Paul Ryan's family was on welfare when he was young. He spent his entire time in Congress trying to destroy the social safety net. Hypocritical! And now he's on the board of Faux Nooz.
Agreed, only one side understands that oligarchy isn't the answer.
Perhaps we need a new definition for what "insurance" means for those politically connected.
When I was screwed over by Countrywide in 2008, I was not in any manner "bailed out", AND when BofA took them over, they were given immunity - I had to drop my "slam dunk" legal suits being prepared vs Countrywide (I had massive documentation of their fraud) AND I had to eat the legal fees I paid to that point.
To those uninsured re: SVB, I politely offer, with appropraite Ts&Ps - GFY!
@flexghost These bonuses were paid out hours before the collapse, but they were scheduled payroll bonuses that were already in motion days or even weeks before the collapse.
There's nothing nefarious there. Clawing them back would just punish the employees, not the actual executives and outside stakeholders who orchestrated the run on SVB.
@flexghost Keep in mind that their assets (as indicated in their Call report which can be viewed here https://cdr.ffiec.gov/public/ManageFacsimiles.aspx ) are fairly low risk assets. It should be possible to quickly liquidate them all for substantial face value.
Rich people and VC backed companies will take a haircut; painful but most companies will be able to survive - and learn to do better due diligence on who is holding their money.
This is the same lesson Bernie Madoff’s investors learned.
Assumes asset sales fully cover deposits +shareholders are wiped out. That money comes from somewhere. The neoliberal take is the state is benevolent and this doesn’t effect the little guy. It does.
Investors taking 0 loss on a failed company would defeat the purpose of the stock market. Eliminating losses for owners creates incentives for capital allocation. If we decide we should socialize losses then we may as well socialize gains as well and why have a private sector?
@carl24k I’m sorry to hear about your subscription service, Internet of things toothbrush of the month business
Start ups are so wonderful and should be protected at all costs
Especially the ones that are basically event planners for the ultra wealthy
If the FDIC doesn't step in to cover the accounts of the bank's clients, up to the $250k limit, that would NOT look good for liquidity in US banking in general.
Our current system is VERY precarious, all it takes is one big shock and suddenly people aren't getting food anymore (because if trust in banking in general were to fail, the entire economy would suddenly go illiquid).
Bailing out the Banks' Clients is good, bailing out the banks themselves is bad. Same reason why the pandemic stimulus funding was TERRIBLE. Most of the funding went straight to banks, etc. If all of the funding went to the people, it would have ended up in the banks anyway, and it would have helped out the average person too.
@flexghost
Right,
If their system selects for failure, then I say, let it fail.. As an example, everyone else gets to get better, so it doesn't happen to them, instead of cutting corners and doing it again.
Efficiency can be bitter and cruel.
IMO,
The current PE and VC models are inhumane to anyone who touches them and that they touch.
Janet Yellin said no tax $$ will be used.
@AndyHarrison lol! “No tax dollars will be used we’re not bailing them out”
A week later “tax dollars are bailing out Wells Fargo”
Kk
I trust Yellen over Paulson -who was CEO of Goldman Sachs and nominated by Dumya Bush.
I love being fucked over.
Article from 2011.
Bailed-out banks paid no income tax in some years, according to study
https://publicintegrity.org/inequality-poverty-opportunity/bailed-out-banks-paid-no-income-tax-in-some-years-according-to-study/
Five banks that received federal bailout funds during the financial crisis didn’t pay income taxes for one or more years between 2008 and 2010, according to an iWatch News analysis of a new study of tax dodgers. Wells Fargo & Co., Goldman Sachs Group, PNC Financial Services Group, Capital One Financial Inc. and State Street […]