Interesting thread concluding that Samsung is using an AI model to replace users’ blurry, super-zoomed photos of the Moon with slightly higher res textures.

How did they discover this?

1. They downloaded a high res image of the Moon
2. Downscaled it to a blurry 170x170px image on their computer monitor
3. Took a photo of it on the Samsung with the room lights out

…and they got a magically higher-res Moon! Clever.

https://reddit.com/r/Android/comments/11nzrb0/samsung_space_zoom_moon_shots_are_fake_and_here/

Samsung "space zoom" moon shots are fake, and here is the proof

**This post has been updated with several additional experiments in newer posts, which address most comments and clarify what exactly is going...

reddit
@adrianhon Today's fraud brought to you by ... tidal locking!
@adamshostack @adrianhon But does the fraud account for lunar libration?
@SteveBellovin @adamshostack @adrianhon I imagine not. But it would be a fun experiment to do!
@adamshostack @adrianhon I dunno... this topic goes back and forth the same way that the moon landing conspiracy folks do. There are a lot of things you can do computationally that are entirely legitimate and used by astrophotography all the time. Brightness, contrast, color channel adjustments, deconvolution... the list goes on.
Shostack + Friends Blog > 100,00 Moon Shots

Amazing and impressive photographs of the moon.

@Lee_Holmes @adrianhon I think my reason for caring is that moon pictures have become shorthand for zoom quality and samsung is cheating and potentially deceiving prospects.
@adamshostack @adrianhon I took this at a Kraken game and thought it was also better than anything I had ever seen - in this case, the people that were special guests at the Coors Lite section drinking a bunch of IPA :) Coors Lite area are the white seats at the bottom right.
@adamshostack @adrianhon I don't understand your point. Do you consider stacking to be fraud?
@Lee_Holmes @adrianhon nope. Stacking is fine. My point is the camera doing it without telling you may be fraud