"We can't do anything about Google's indexing about the Fediverse, so we're giving them a pass."
No, you can do something about Google: build better Fediverse search.
"We can't do anything about Google's indexing about the Fediverse, so we're giving them a pass."
No, you can do something about Google: build better Fediverse search.
By the way, the window of opportunity to build better Fediverse search than Google is closing every day.
Each day that Fediverse search is not built is another day Google extends its monopoly into the Fediverse.
What good is de-centralization if centralization occurs via search?
@atomicpoet not sure why we should care too much about this... 🤔
If they want to invest their money, time and resources in indexing the #Fediverse instead of us doing it (and spend the money, time and resources... for free!)... why shall we worry about it?
@kikobar Because centralization is awful, and so are tech monopolies.
This is why I care.
will continue indexing regardless.
In your profile preferences, you can attempt to stop search engines from indexing you.
But, I would not bet on it.
@atomicpoet what many ignore is that most of the content on Fedi instance is publicly accessible, and anything with a public URL is, by definition, indexable.
All the backlash against searching the Fedi is pointless, when a Google custom search that includes the largest instances is just a few clicks away.
We can discuss how to build a search mechanism that offers admins and users control over who can search what, but there's no discussion about the need of a search engine.
The arguments of those who shout at everybody discussing a search for the Fedi are as good as those of the old man yelling at running trains.
@atomicpoet last time I checked there were quite a few people who were opposed to fediverse search.
Regarding Google, they worked on realtime Twitter search for a while but axed that. I forgot why.