There is an alternate timeline where the semantic web took off and there was wide investment in ontological tooling to ensure that the information in academic papers, websites, and applications was structured and accessible to future processing.

We instead live in a world where all the useful data is trapped inside proprietary formats, and entangled in meaningless prose - a world primed for large language models to come along and hallucinate the data that might contained therein.

@sarahjamielewis Do you have any reading recommendations for the semantic web stuff? I'm very lost.

@Madagascar_Sky @sarahjamielewis I found this one painful and I don't agree with all of it, but very well written:

https://twobithistory.org/2018/05/27/semantic-web.html

In my opinion it misses Wikidata, but I'm biased.

Whatever Happened to the Semantic Web?

In 2001, Tim Berners-Lee, inventor of the World Wide Web, published an article in Scientific American.

@vrandecic @Madagascar_Sky @sarahjamielewis

Okay, right, Denny is biased, he helped make #Wikidata the right way :)

I used to teach how worthless the promises of Semantic Web were. But since Wikidata reached a useful size, there is now quite a lot of useful things one can do with the data, so now I teach that there is a glimmer of hope called Wikidata and federated databases....

@WiseWoman @vrandecic @Madagascar_Sky @sarahjamielewis I once heard Peter Norvig perfectly summarize the problems with the Semantic Web to a True Believer who was trying to proselyte him: "People are lazy, and they lie." (One can add other human traits too: they are mistaken, they disagree, etc.)

@shriramk @WiseWoman @Madagascar_Sky @sarahjamielewis

Those are very relevant observations, and this leads to the one large question the Semantic Web never answered: how does the incentive infrastructure look like? The few parts of the Semantic Web that provided a decent answer to that question were the ones that were successful: schema.org, Wikidata and the wider GLAM world, usage inside emails, inside organizations as a data integration technology.

@vrandecic @shriramk @WiseWoman @Madagascar_Sky @sarahjamielewis

Very interesting debate, I guess one upcoming incentive for semantic tech could be archiving and note keeping. For those that encounter so much info on feeds this could provide better private and collaborative means to collect stuff: ordering, selecting, describing, developing. I am thinking of the experience of using pinterest, tumblr, pinboard, obsidian, etc. as kind of cross-platform extensions to feeds and online collections.

@lukasfx @shriramk @WiseWoman @Madagascar_Sky @sarahjamielewis

Yes, I agree, I think Semantic Web technology is underused in the personal and collaborative note taking space. Hypothes.is is an interesting approach in that direction.

But I'm this space you have to explain what the difference is to bookmarking extensions in your browser, delicious, and the Google Sidewiki, and why it would succeed where these things are not widely used today.

@vrandecic
@shriramk @WiseWoman @Madagascar_Sky @sarahjamielewis
the hope is we can build it p2p ;)
https://jon-e.net/infrastructure/
I'm v much on Aaron Swartz page in that the "people lie" argument is a strawman - if you're trying to make the semweb as a space of communication rather than "true" and uniform data, it is no longer the fatal problem it's presented as.
Decentralized Infrastructure for (Neuro)science

Decentralized Infrastructure for (Neuro)science