One thing I am always surprised at when people discuss Twitter/Mastodon clients is that there are apparently still so many people who attempt to consume every post in their timeline. I pretty much gave up any pretense of treating my timeline like an inbox years ago.
(Not an argument for algorithmic timelines at all BTW. I just don’t care that much about rock solid timeline position restoration because I don’t even pretend to follow everything that happens on here.)
@buzz I learned to --love-- tolerate the algorithmic timeline at some point. My hope for mastodon is that I’ll be able to tweak the variables to some degree and end up with something that works a bit better. I don’t need much more optimization than the 2000s era Bayesian spam filters tbh.
@jimray Perhaps a more thoughtful algorithm might habitually say “Hey, here’s someone you haven’t seen in awhile! Guess what—they still exist!”

@buzz yeah, some combination of “I always want to see posts from my wife and my good pal Buzz (whom I miss and hope I get to see again soon)” and “this is probably actually interesting to you in a way that isn’t creepy”

YouTube actually does a good job of this, I’m hearing TikTok is similar. I suspect it’s somewhat easier since those are both built around surfacing interesting content, not building on top of social graphs.

@jimray @buzz that was the exact case that first made me hate Twitter’s algo view: missing a tweet from my wife. (The “someone faved this” stuff that made faves into soft RTs was the other big source of ire.)
@marcprecipice @jimray Yeah, that stuff was a huge mistake. Made Twitter feel like a panopticon.