I've said this before but the most pathetic thing about current RW culture wars is that they are defending a lifestyle -- giant SUVs, highways, strip malls, fast food, suburbs, poisonous/deadly consumer products -- that is 100% a creation of late-20th century corporations.
It's not some authentic just-folks small-town Mayberry life. It's a life of shitty, dangerous, disposable junk, foisted on these people by multinational corporations, and they're out defending every bit of it with their lives, like f'ing chumps.
One universal truth about the forces of reaction -- at any time, in any country -- is that they are being relentlessly exploited, manipulated, and grifted from above by people who don't give a shit about them, and they never seem to care.
The Big Daddy tells them to get angry about light bulbs, they get angry about light bulbs.
Actual small-town rural life maybe involved a rifle for hunting. Now reactionaries have been convinced by gun manufacturers, through their quislings at the NRA, that a true authentic American lifestyle involves owning multiple military weapons. Just absolute chumps.
And the *actual* life they've been granted by their corporate masters is bleak & depressing AF, so white men are experiencing ongoing pandemics of drug addiction, loneliness, violence, abuse, & suicide. Yet all their rage is bent to defending the products those masters sell them.
Harvey J. Miller @[email protected] on Twitter

“A woman is afraid that her granddaughter’s 1/4 mile walk in a “fairly safe suburb” is dangerous because of the people who work to facilitate that suburban lifestyle. Americans are afraid of the wrong things. https://t.co/rtCQsneTRI”

Twitter
They fled cities into suburbs to feel isolated and safe from poor & brown people, but now they're even prisoners in their suburban homes, because walking around outside in suburbs means a gauntlet of poor & brown service workers! Gotta keep the kids inside, attached to screens.
Meanwhile, in Dutch cities the same 9yos routinely go to and from school, run errands, & go to see friends, all without parental accompaniment, thereby developing crucial skills (autonomy, wayfinding, decisionmaking) that will help them later in life.
That's because of good infrastructure: walking is safe & transit is plentiful & there are always plenty of eyes on the street & the people you live near are accustomed to seeing you around. The result: happier, more resilient kids. https://www.volts.wtf/p/the-many-social-and-psychological#details
The many social and psychological benefits of low-car cities

A few years ago, Melissa and Chris Bruntlett and their two children moved from Vancouver, Canada, to Delft, a small city in the Netherlands where 80% of journeys are taken by foot, bicycle, or public transit. Their new book, Curbing Traffic, is about what it's like to live in a truly low-car city, and how other cities can capture some of the same benefits.

Volts
Now, do Americans live in isolated suburban castles, afraid to let their children walk a half-mile outside, forced to drive their kids in polluting cars over unsafe roads to go anywhere, because of some spontaneous expression of their preferences? That's just what they like?
Preferences are only legible in the presence of choice. Do most Americans choose where & how roads are designed & built? What kinds of land use are & aren't legal? What crops are & aren't subsidized? What's made affordable to them & what isn't?
People who love what they've got but never had a choice to have anything else are not expressing a "preference" so much as Stockholm Syndrome, or more charitably, system justification -- the propensity to deem the system you're born into right & necessary. https://www.volts.wtf/p/why-social-change-is-so-excruciatingly
Why social change is so excruciatingly difficult

When we look across the broad sweep of human history, what needs explaining is not times of rebellion and upheaval, but the much more common periods of unjust rule facing little resistance. Why do people so often internalize the ideologies upholding systems under which they suffer? Why do they fail to fight back? Psychologist John Jost has an answer. I talked it over with him.

Volts
If Americans were given a real, actual choice to live in places that would make both them & their children physically & psychologically healthier, I bet lots would take it, but they're embedded in a system that has made that choice impossible & convinced them it doesn't exist.
I wrote this whole long thread ... and then he just illustrated it in one tweet.
@drvolts
If he so desperately wants a candy bar with a clear anatomically linked position on the gender binary he really ought to stick to Almond Joy. After all, it has nuts (and its counterpart Mounds doesn't).
@drvolts It's reverse Poe's law.
@drvolts https://www.forbes.com/sites/danidiplacido/2023/01/13/tucker-carlson-is-once-again-mad-about-woke-mms/ Why won't the woke mob just let that guy & Sucker Carlscum fuck their candy in peace?!!! It's an outrage.
Tucker Carlson Is, Once Again, Mad About ‘Woke M&Ms’

Once again, right-wing culture warriors are angry about cartoon M&Ms.

Forbes

@drvolts Just imagine being a strong, independent, virile beast of an alpha male being afraid of...*checks notes* ...imaginary female chocolate

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

@drvolts Only males are going in that alpha male's mouth. Sorry, I vote advanced sarcasm. Grammar's too good for sincerity at that level.

@drvolts

No lady M&Ms?

Doesn't he understand where baby M&Ms come from?

@drvolts

Many people who live in rural areas live there because it's where their parents could afford a house 20-30 years ago. Family infrastructure while raising kids is more important than good transit, assuming said quality transit could be found in higher density areas.

The only place I've lived where the transit was great was the East Coast. Everywhere I've been on the West Coast has garbage transit, so people drive everywhere instead, rural or city.

@drvolts transit and traffic in King County, WA was horrible. The education system is very likely significantly better than the rural county I currently live in, but I couldn't afford a place for my family to live there (with decent room for kids and office for work) and would have no family support. It just wouldn't make sense.

In California where I lived there were constant fires and severe drought. I'd never go back.

@drvolts the few places that offer a more bikable or walkable lifestyle tend to be more expensive too.
@drvolts fun (not fun?) reminder that Stockholm Syndrome the actual thing was named by a sexist male authority figure when the woman hostage involved quite rationally and intelligently decided not to trust or rely on him or other indifferent authorities, and tried to save her own life.

@drvolts I think the really hard part here is: having space is nice! I love living in a city but it's a constant compromise: storage is at a premium, it's annoyingly noisy, my kitchen is tiny, and there was no way we could have afforded two kids without forcing them to share a bedroom through adolescence. And in the immediate post-ww2 era, most urban apartments were airless hotboxes in summer.

But there's no law but the law of unintended consequences. :(

@drvolts

I see the same "siege mentality" when reading historical accounts about red state plantation slavery before the Civil War.

Slaves had begun to murder & poison their slave masters and have more frequent slave revolts.

The response wasn't "Why are slaves killing their oppressors?" introspection.

The response was increasingly horrific cruelty instead; to slaves and to democracy.

Nancy McLean "Democracy in Chains"
Barbara F. Walter "How Civil Wars Start"

@drvolts I'd by happier about my kid biking places on his own if a mistake didn't result in medical bankruptcy (or worse with the fashion of kid killing front ends on trucks and SUVs now).
@drvolts Which is why seeing 7 & 8 year old kids riding on the subway to school during morning rush hour here in Tokyo isn’t a big deal. It’s amazing what happens when you think long term, invest in infrastructure for the benefit of everyone & have a society where living in constant fear of everyone else (because you’re only interested in taking care of yourself & those immediately surrounding you) isn’t the norm.
@drvolts
Autonomy? Decision making? No way! How does that produce a population of docile worker/consumer units?
@drvolts Of course, statistically a girl her age is far more likely to be assaulted by a family member than a stranger.

@drvolts I'm so, so tired.

This person should be forced to watch "Old Enough" on a loop, clockwork-orange style.

@memory @drvolts Yeah, I was going to bring up Old Enough. There's a great ep of 99pi about the reasons why it's so much safer for young kids to be independent in Tokyo than in US cities (even without producers watching them the entire time.)
@mikej @drvolts yeah. I think the show is a great corrective to the idea that kids can’t do anything on their own and must be monitored at all times, but it’s a fair cop that for ugly logistical reasons (almost all of which are cars) there’s a lot of things they show that are authentically much more dangerous here.
@drvolts That is insane. I was walking half a mile to and from school in first grade. I cannot comprehend a parent, let alone a grandparent, freaking out so much about HALF that distance.
@drvolts It's the craziness of having an arsenal you could never use - the idea that if the government ever did move against you that the 101st airborne wouldn't unleash a thermobaric weapon on your mountain hideaway... if the government were ever to really genuinely come for these nuts all the guns in the world wouldn't help them.
@drvolts “Look over there! No, no, no…….not here. Over there!”
@drvolts i think what they are defending isn’t the products per se but their own boundless individualism