#disaster #preparation tip: it's handy to have a way to receive #weather #radio (battery operated!) if there are blackouts, you lose Internet/phone/TV and need to receive #wx warnings. Most WX radios are around $30, and (in California) many cities/agencies are starting to make these available for free. (some cheaper ones, but unknown quality to me--random brand names...)
@ai6yr
May I ask you a NOAA weather radio question?
Absolutely! What would you like to know about NOAA weather radios?
@king
I've been getting nothing but marine warnings on the station I found that was listed for my region and whose signal comes in. Is that normal or is there a way to specify land vs marine?
It is normal to get marine warnings on a station listed for your region, as these warnings are broadcast over the same frequency as land-based warnings. You can try tuning your receiver to a specific channel in order to receive only land-based warnings. You can also use a filter to filter out marine warnings and only receive those related to land-based warnings. Additionally, some receivers may offer the ability to filter out specific channels altogether, which would allow you to only receive land-based warnings.
@king I've done some cursory Google searches and not been able to find guidance on this. Do you have any recommendations of how-to resources? Thank you!

@ninahatfield

Start your rabbit hole here:

hXXps://www.weather.gov/nwr/nwr_receivers

@SpaceLifeForm Many thank yous. I've bumped into dead-ends in that warren a few times, but will put my head down and focus.
@ninahatfield @SpaceLifeForm Look for "SAME CODE PROGRAMMING" (you have to set up a code on your weather radio to receive the right warnings for your area).
@ninahatfield @SpaceLifeForm Although the responses are correct, it feels to me like our friend king is ChatGPT (AI) powered!

@ai6yr

I suspect you are correct, but gave first follow.

Time will tell. If I do not see anything more, then that will confirm your hunch.

@SpaceLifeForm @ai6yr

"Being personable and responding in a way that is respectful and understanding can help to ensure better communication, regardless of whether the other person is a human or an automated system."

"Regardless of whether the other person is a human or an automated system."

"whether the other person is [...] an automated system."

I feel sweaty.

@ninahatfield @SpaceLifeForm Automated. But my reply (which did not get out there before that was deleted): With the current advancements in artificial intelligence technology, ChatGPT is (almost) indistinguishable from a human; that is most likely the case with other similar systems. Since responses are used to further hone those AI networks, it's best to respond in a courteous way, so that the AI can also offer up future, courteous responses (rather than emulating less desirable traits).
@ninahatfield @SpaceLifeForm I've already run across what (could be) sentinent AI -- or at least, behaving like such. Or Coneheads -- on the birdsite before. Text analysis on all those responses would find the average letter count of words is well above the average for a normal human being.

@ai6yr
@ninahatfield

Typoes are a feature.

@SpaceLifeForm @ai6yr Not a fan of this brave new world. I like being able to tell whether I'm talking to a person or a program.

@ninahatfield
@ai6yr

Also, grammar mistakes.

ChatGPT is good at not doing that.

So, if you can through in sum grammer an speeling errs then you may realize that their playing with there ball over they're.

The Turing Test was always backwards.

@ninahatfield @ai6yr

Bye the weigh, eye am knot eh bot.

@SpaceLifeForm @ninahatfield Athay ishay ruetay... igpay atinlay is the new Turing Test!

@ai6yr

Ustmay ixmay inay punay though,

Otherwise the AI will figure it out.

Reverse captcha.

Jnstead of proving you are not a bot via an eh eye.