Another thing to remember about the #OGL is how I think it was shaped by two events of the '90s.

First was the start of Wizards of the Coast. The Primal Order, their first product, resulted in a lawsuit from Palladium Games because they included conversion appendixes for a variety of RPG systems. (TPO was a "capsystem" product meant to be added on your game of choice.) This is exactly the sort of thing that people are now claiming is obviously fair use. It was not so obvious, Wizards well knew!

The threat was so grave and existential that a new corporation, Garfield Games, was formed just to publish Magic: The Gathering, so that it could get investment that would not be threatened by the possibility of the whole company being destroyed by the Primal Order litigation.

After the TPO suit was settled out of court, Garfield Games was merged into Wizards of the Coast. The people who ran WotC in 2000, such as Peter Adkison, know personally how much water the "this is fair use!" argument

held in actual pragmatic fact for a publisher. All it took was one game company to decide they disagreed that it was fair and were willing to file suit over it.

The second event was the near bankruptcy of TSR. Again, key people (such as Ryan Dancey) involved in rescuing D&D from the implosion of TSR by facilitating its sale to WotC, had that experience to inform the creation of the OGL. It was not impossible to imagine D&D being owned by some corporate entity that did not care about it;

@Johnnephew
All it took was one game company to decide they disagreed that it was fair and were willing to file suit over it.
That, and a judge to agree with them. Or a target that isn't confident enough to take it to court.

I think this is something that desperately needs to be tested in court, because nobody knows what is and isn't legal here, and everything gets decided by who has the biggest lawyer. (Or who can even afford a lawyer.)

@mcv

Keep in mind too that insurers would be involved, and are almost certainly going to pressure people to settle rather than risk the cost and uncertainty of going to trial.

Basically, anyone can sue anyone for any reason. Even a meritless suit that is thrown out and the court awards fees & expenses to the party wrongly sued, is a cost and disruption that people want to avoid if they can.

@Johnnephew @mcv It is not always wise to remove ambiguity, because the knife can cut the other way. That's assuming the challenger can get a crack legal team. Plus, the rights holder probably won't sue unless they think they can win: they choose the battleground.

"Bad facts make bad law."

That said, I'll repeat my idea balloon: what about an Open TTRPG Legal Defense Fund?