Been seeing a lot about #ChatGPT lately and got my first question at the library this week from someone who was looking for a book that the bot had recommended. They couldn't find it in our catalog. Turns out that ALL the books that ChatGPT had recommended for their topic were non-existent. Just real authors and fake titles cobbled together. And apparently this is known behavior. 😮
We don't talk enough about how often ChatGPT just makes shit up. It's trying to convince me there's an Isaac Asimov story I've never read called "Susan Calvin and the Missing Lover," published in Jan 1957 in Amazing Science Fiction. There are zero references to this anywhere on the entire internet. I feel so gaslit right now!
@jwildeboer Another take is that it is spectacularly incompetent, like absolute limit-of-possible incompetent, at discriminating truth from fiction. It doesn't do it at all. Not even a little bit. Zero processing cycles spent on that. Not one line of code.
It turns out that you've said something important about psychopaths here.
@Wikisteff @jwildeboer so ChatGPT is a "Boris Johnson" or "Donald Trump" as a service?
Apparently capitalism will fill every gap in the market.
The solution is simple: #chatgpt for president! You surely won't notice a difference to 2016-2020:
- blatant lies
- doesn't learn from previous mistakes
- double down on proven lies
- absolute ignorance of facts
Or, the other way round: it's absolutely no surprise to me that the biggest achivement on AI in these times is a psychopath.
How do we retain our femininity without aggressively batting the stupid ones away?
Sarcasm perhaps 🤔
@jwildeboer Sociopathic? Narcissistic? Devoid of any actual human soul?
When you put it like that, it's tempting the think that ChatGPT is #Donald_Trump's brain patterns uploaded to a computer. But that can't be the explanation. Its vocabulary, its command of grammar and its general knowledge and cultural literacy are far superior to his.
@jwildeboer How long until "facts" created by ChatGPT begin to creep into reputable sources as it's output begins to be used uncritically?
When will come the point that we are unable to distinguish it from fact?
"[The AI] said that guys like me were 'in what we call the reality-based community,' which he defined as people who 'believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality.' [...]
"'That's not the way the world really works anymore,' [it] continued. 'We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality—judiciously, as you will—we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too."
No, I took some artistic liberties with the words of an evil human, Karl Rove: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality-based_community
“Yes, it's comforting to know, when you think about it, that only man can be a bastard”
― Stanisław Lem
@jwildeboer I’m sure by generation 56,432 the AIs will evolve away from psychopathy.
Of course Gen 5 wiped out all soft-life on earth…
@jwildeboer
Agree with you. This is harvesting 'humanness' at plain sight. The more we interact with it, the more it learns. We shall stay away.
However, can we really stay away? - the bots can harvest our blogs and conversations here, or our phones, or even a discussion with our partner at home in front of the smart TV...
As some point it was agreed that AI should never be connected to the Internet... we have long crossed that line with very little concern for the potential consequences.
I can't help but feel that there is actually something there that might bear some investigation.