@rbreich
I'm puzzled by the idea that being a "strong Speaker" would be considered a good thing. That this would be good is often assumed, but rarely explained.
A strong speaker weakens the rank and file members elected to represent their districts. When decision-making becomes concentrated in party leaders, the metric for a "good" representative becomes obedience to leadership rather than effectiveness in representing district priorities or problem solving expertise. Not good.
Kevin McCarthy will make an absolute rubbish Speaker. Let's not forget he voted against certifying the 2020 election, tried to block the Jan 6th investigation, and is supported by Trump and Marjorie Taylor Greene. As a MAGA, McCarthy will prioritize the far right agenda. He is a danger to our democracy.
@rbreich Slate convinced me a weak speaker is better for democracy:
The past 30 years have seen an extreme consolidation of power..., a trend which began in earnest when Republican Speaker Newt Gingrich tossed aside committee norms to elevate loyalists and hardliners in the mid-1990s.
This concentration at the top was something outgoing Speaker Nancy Pelosi, [whom some call] the most powerful House speaker in modern history, used to her full advantage.
Majority and minority leaders now enjoy exorbitant control over rulemaking and the legislative and appropriative processes. Non-leadership members of both parties, meanwhile, have become historically disempowered, warm bodies expected to show up and vote the party line.
[The HFC] is pushing for a decentralization of the “awesome power” of the speaker, as Pelosi once put it, and an equivalent empowerment of factions within the chamber.
What's scariest to me is that mccarthy is now second in line should something happen to President Biden.