@rbreich Slate convinced me a weak speaker is better for democracy:
The past 30 years have seen an extreme consolidation of power..., a trend which began in earnest when Republican Speaker Newt Gingrich tossed aside committee norms to elevate loyalists and hardliners in the mid-1990s.
This concentration at the top was something outgoing Speaker Nancy Pelosi, [whom some call] the most powerful House speaker in modern history, used to her full advantage.
Majority and minority leaders now enjoy exorbitant control over rulemaking and the legislative and appropriative processes. Non-leadership members of both parties, meanwhile, have become historically disempowered, warm bodies expected to show up and vote the party line.
[The HFC] is pushing for a decentralization of the “awesome power” of the speaker, as Pelosi once put it, and an equivalent empowerment of factions within the chamber.