I'm in the Star Tribune with some thoughts about Hamline University's academic freedom violations and the very foolish idea of essentially instituting a blasphemy ban.

A blasphemy exception is not a narrow, reasonable cutout that protects students from "harm." Don't believe me? Just take a cursory look at what constitutes religious offense around the world.

https://www.startribune.com/banning-blasphemy-hamline-cancels-academic-freedom/600241100/

Banning blasphemy, Hamline cancels academic freedom

This decision opens Pandora's box of academic restrictions.

Star Tribune
I always enjoy getting feedback.
I’ve got people ~~~McLaughing~~~
@sarahemclaugh
Truely a goal to strive for.
@sarahemclaugh keep McHonking I’m McLaughing
@sarahemclaugh It needs a better cadence. 4/10.
@sarahemclaugh I have no idea what any of that means.
@sarahemclaugh not a bad first draft, but he needs to run it by the writers room for some notes
@sarahemclaugh I mean, actually, I expected very little, but this is kind of impressive and not terrible.
@Popehat there was effort involved and I think we should celebrate that
@sarahemclaugh why can't I get feedback like that? Mine is all legal and death threats.
@mmasnick because you don’t get the people McLaughing, Mike
@sarahemclaugh @mmasnick New words! Can I get a McRib with my McLaugh?
@sarahemclaugh they really missed it by not making this to the tune of Mr Boombastic
@sarahemclaugh What the McFuck does any of that mean?
@sarahemclaugh At least some effort went into it. ¯\_ (ツ)_/¯
@sarahemclaugh Cancel culture strikes again!

It’s pretty clear no one thought through the practical ramifications of this.

Via @sarahemclaugh

@sarahemclaugh Point out that a blasphemy ban will only invite MORE blasphemy.

For example:

"Fuck Jesus up the ass with a razor-wire-wrapped baseball bat until he dies on the cross. PONTIUS PILATE WAS RIGHT!!!!!"

Just, for example...

@sarahemclaugh Read Ken White's take on this situation today. How embarrassing for Hamline. Doubly so, as they do not even seem to realize how embarrassed they should be.
@sarahemclaugh blasphemy is a victimless crime.
@sarahemclaugh The beauty of a blasphemy ban is that it is totally arbitrarily defined by the person(s) offended and is subject to change without notice. It is also without any verifiable foundation.
@sarahemclaugh the only place a blasphemy charge or rule should hold any weight is inside the actual mosque/church/portapotty of that faith
@sarahemclaugh McLaughing… this should be framed and put on a wall.
@sarahemclaugh
While some are busy McLaughing,
Others err by continually McGaffing.
Blaspheming is easy,
And makes devouts queasy,
But risks a dungeon McRacking.

@sarahemclaugh It would be so much fun if they actually respected the stated religion of their students for this.

I would instantly convert to Kopimism, go to online lectures, and then tell them that any mention of copyright violations being illegal is a religious offense.

„Yes, I know I’m sitting in the law class, but you cannot actually mention copyright when I’m around, so you cannot include it in the exam.“

@sarahemclaugh

Whoosh! It’s super-lucky these all-powerful beings have earthly thought police to stop them from being insulted a second time.

Maybe sense will prevail and we won’t have grown adults with invisible friends operating cars, weapons or political office.