I'm in the Star Tribune with some thoughts about Hamline University's academic freedom violations and the very foolish idea of essentially instituting a blasphemy ban.

A blasphemy exception is not a narrow, reasonable cutout that protects students from "harm." Don't believe me? Just take a cursory look at what constitutes religious offense around the world.

https://www.startribune.com/banning-blasphemy-hamline-cancels-academic-freedom/600241100/

Banning blasphemy, Hamline cancels academic freedom

This decision opens Pandora's box of academic restrictions.

Star Tribune
I always enjoy getting feedback.
I’ve got people ~~~McLaughing~~~
@sarahemclaugh keep McHonking I’m McLaughing
@sarahemclaugh It needs a better cadence. 4/10.
@sarahemclaugh I have no idea what any of that means.
@sarahemclaugh not a bad first draft, but he needs to run it by the writers room for some notes
@sarahemclaugh I mean, actually, I expected very little, but this is kind of impressive and not terrible.
@Popehat there was effort involved and I think we should celebrate that
@sarahemclaugh why can't I get feedback like that? Mine is all legal and death threats.
@mmasnick because you don’t get the people McLaughing, Mike
@sarahemclaugh @mmasnick New words! Can I get a McRib with my McLaugh?
@sarahemclaugh they really missed it by not making this to the tune of Mr Boombastic
@sarahemclaugh What the McFuck does any of that mean?
@sarahemclaugh At least some effort went into it. ¯\_ (ツ)_/¯