Look. I've said it before and I'll say it again. If Harry has a problem with his family then he needs to persuade the French to fund him, raise an army, invade and seize the crown.

What else was Brexit for, if not to restore traditional British approaches and values?

QUESTION FOR THE EXPERTS: If the French back a Harry-led invasion and seizure of the crown, then he reasserts his right to the French throne, reverse invades and restores the French monarchy in a personal union with the British one...

...does that get us back into the EU?

So what I'm hearing is that the 'Reverse Harry' (not a sex move) will only work if, on seizing the French throne AFTER seizing the British one, he declares the restoration of the Angevin Empire.

That would count as a French successor state, and thus retain EU membership.

Hmmm...

@garius I say: let's bring back the Plantagenets. It all went to poo after that Welsh usurper illegally seized the throne in 1485. The nation could benefit from the firm slap of the Plantagenet hand on it's flabby (metaphorical) bottom.
@thebellman @garius
I never understood why Henry II never attacked Paris.
@garius @5klp471 probably got lost on the way