Look. I've said it before and I'll say it again. If Harry has a problem with his family then he needs to persuade the French to fund him, raise an army, invade and seize the crown.
What else was Brexit for, if not to restore traditional British approaches and values?
QUESTION FOR THE EXPERTS: If the French back a Harry-led invasion and seizure of the crown, then he reasserts his right to the French throne, reverse invades and restores the French monarchy in a personal union with the British one...
...does that get us back into the EU?
So what I'm hearing is that the 'Reverse Harry' (not a sex move) will only work if, on seizing the French throne AFTER seizing the British one, he declares the restoration of the Angevin Empire.
That would count as a French successor state, and thus retain EU membership.
Hmmm...
@garius This sounds very much like you've connected the part of your brain that makes up CK3 run ideas with the part that deals with the existential horror of modern politics.
Also to make things more difficult you must do this as Norse Asatru and not start any wars.
@abstractcode tbh we should have flipped to "female rulers only"
then it would have gone to Anne.
John Bull
Colin