@annaleen This. I've had to think harder about this because I also had to write alt-text to accompany the image embedded with a link. It's definitely a more thoughtful process.
I can understand marginalized persons especially BIPOC want QT, but cultural reasons are a different driver than productivity.
We should be asking what marginalized communities *need* to achieve their aims rather than ask if they want what was provided with little to no BIPOC input at a commercial platform.
Exactly
@annaleen I think it has been overlooked that you can already quote post by including a link to the original post.
I've been a journalist for over twenty years -- I've written for venues ranging from tiny zines to the New York Times. And I think users should have control over quote-posts. If a journo wants to report something that they can’t quote-post, I believe that the ten-second friction required to cut-and-paste some text, or to screengrab it, is helpful to the journalistic process. Taking a beat to consider whether we really want to quote something, and how we want to frame it? Literally our job.
Inserting the link to a toot at present does not notify the original poster, whereas a good implementation of Annalee's proposal would.
Of course, bad actors could still avoid notifying by using a screenshot or a link, as they can now. But benign users of QT would be happy that the OP was notified.
@annaleen
“ Taking a beat to consider whether we really want to quote something, and how we want to frame it? Literally our job.”
Yes! I didn’t know how to articulate this the way you did but yes… this exactly.
@annaleen how would you prevent screenshots? How would you prevent, that the url to a toot is copied and pasted?
You cannot.
And that's not possible, it's better to accept that and make quotes a feature. This way, it can be controlled how it looks and behaves.
@annaleen this "friction" doesn't make it harder to harass a person. It only harms persons that should be protected. To have better protection, a working quote toot feature should be there, so that quoted persons can directly see, where they are quoted.
Not having such a feature is harmful.
@tn5421 @annaleen true. With this friction, it's easier to harass people. Good use cases suffer, though. If I'm annoyed by a toot, it's easy enough to copy the url or Screenshot and poste that, adding a comment like "what a moron". Because then "energy" isn't much of an issue.
But for adding something like "look that's nice" - I often couldn't be bothered.
Having no quote feature achieves the opposite of what is actually wanted.
@annaleen This is really thoughtful. As usual for your toots/tweets.
I thought this was simpler until I read your take.
Thank you!
@annaleen this whole thing is moot. There are two forks of Mastodon code that are still federated that allows quote toots.
@[email protected] @[email protected] My personal instance (this one), that I just spun up today, is a Misskey server, which has quote-posting. So does Akkoma. It's certainly not as simple as "have people who want quote-posting spin up their own Misskey servers", but it seems like getting the word out about them would be helpful. RE: @[email protected] Screen cap with a link is very rude to photographers and artists. Who are often the people I want to QT the most, sometimes with some context for the image, others, using it as a jumping off point for a greater reflection. QT lets people use images and give full credit. And it helps those images get more attention. It's about collaboration. text+image=something new and more alive than either alone RE: ...