@taylorlorenz the link previews thing is complicated because retrieving the data for them is decentralized, meaning each instance (and sometimes, each *app*!) is hitting the website for the preview info. It’s often been omitted because it can knock small websites offline just dealing with serving previews when a popular user shares a link.
@anildash I agree with Taylor about quote posts. Basic tool of press criticism for me.
@jayrosen_nyu @anildash How about just replying to a post. Like this? I like the fact that Mastodon promotes conversation not amplification.

Re this ⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️

from @leo

When I absolutely positively want to do the equivalent of QT, this is my workaround. Most of the time I just boost and then reply if I feel a need to join the conversation.

This order -- the original first followed by my two cents, rather than encapsulating what I'm discussing inside my words -- feels more appropriate in any case.

@jayrosen_nyu @anildash @taylorlorenz

#journalism

@dangillmor This might be a quibble, but ... since most of us (I think) use a default reverse-history timeline view, your method of boosting then replying would mean that we see the reply before the boost. It might be counter-intuitive, but I'm guessing that if you want us to read the original post first, it would be better to reply *before* boosting.
@leo @jayrosen_nyu @anildash @taylorlorenz