I would really like to quote-tweet this, adding my 2 cents and amplifying Taylor's words.
But I can't. And that's unfortunate.
I would really like to quote-tweet this, adding my 2 cents and amplifying Taylor's words.
But I can't. And that's unfortunate.
@adaitsman @dak3 It was ... half my point.
Anyone determined enough can figure out a way, but it should be easier than this.
@deltatux @dak3 @adaitsman @edbott yeah, and I don't think so much demand it, but rather: make the case for it's utility, in general or for Mastodon specifically.
To Taylors point: maybe without it, it won't draw a crucial mass of journalists. But then the devs might say: maybe that goal (courting journalists, growing huge) isn't something a platform like this should actively even seek to achieve, even if it'd be cool.
@deltatux @dak3 @adaitsman @edbott on the other hand, how some Twitter-like QT feature may or may not be used for harassment if brought over here (into a different system, different culture, probably a different user-base than Twitter) seems really hard to predict.
Maybe it inevitably does once you reach a certain huge number of users, enough to draw over habitual abusers. Or maybe not, the same patterns/threat worries don't apply here
@deltatux @dak3 @adaitsman @edbott the Twitter algorithm definitely worked towards making QT's, especially really controversial ones, surface in my feed regularly: with Twitter, no matter when I logged on, I'd be caught up with all the latest fights and digs and takes on "the main character" of the day, as things tended to go
I _think_ that's not as possible or as likely the way this place is set up. Don't know though