For some odd reason, flight tracking has been in the news. Perfect time for the first post here, with an infosec/flight tracking crossover that couldn't be more topical.

Usual caveat: None of this should be construed as some sort of value statement, it's just me providing the facts from a security researcher's point of view.

First there's a new article published at the 10th OpenSky Symposium (and online today at https://www.mdpi.com/2673-4591/28/1/7). It discusses how some owners of private jets have been trying to subvert public and crowdsourced data.

Great example provided below, an anonymous user trying to pass off Bernard Arnault's jet (of @laviondebernard fame) with transponder ID 395580 as a non-existing generic Air France aircraft. There were many more cases of astroturfing that we found. Full talk available now here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIz6M1YAI_g&list=PLNft4qtPGeqN0MtUc_k-R-H3wvxUN0WVq&index=4

But with everyone nowadays apparently an expert on flight tracking and blocking (taking over from epidemiology and military strategy it seems), it's some more science communication time: I want to submit two more articles for your reading pleasure.

1. Tracking aircraft is a fact of life in an era of cheap software defined radios. The ability to do so was a design decision for compatibility and safety done 30 years ago. It affects all stakeholders, unless you're the military and can switch all your comms off. Long analysis here in our 2018 paper: https://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/files/9919/eurosnp.pdf

It will also explain why all existing methods to prevent tracking are, sometimes hilariously, inept from a computer security perspective. This includes, but is not limited to web tracker blocking programmes (BARR, ASDI, LADD or whatever the flavour du jour is) and also the Privacy ICAO address (PIA) programme. They all are security through obscurity *at best*.

2. When the PIA was announced in 2019 it was clear it wouldn't do a single thing to make anybody more private. Sadly, it seems that FAA and NBAA never asked anyone familiar with computer security when designing this (we offered, no dice). So we started collecting data right when it went online in 2020 (before covid) to show it's useless.

You can read our analysis here, and it's been proven correct plenty of times in practice by now: https://cs.ox.ac.uk/files/13229/flying-in-private-mode.pdf
In short: It's like being the only one on a university campus on the TOR mixnet and using it to make a bomb threat in order to stop an exam. You'll stick out like a sore thumb and the police will have no trouble identifying you. [1]

Bernard Arnault realized correctly that the only privacy solution is to charter/fractional ownership. https://edition.cnn.com/2022/10/19/business/bernard-arnault-sells-private-jet-over-twitter-tracking/index.html

Again, this is not a value statement, it's just how the world is right now and it won't change anytime soon. Not with 100k cheap crowdsourced trackers globally and more by the day.

Tl;dr: Been droning on about aircraft privacy for over half a decade (NB: I was certainly not the only one!). Nobody cared. In 2022, shit hit the fan.

[1] https://www.forbes.com/sites/runasandvik/2013/12/18/harvard-student-receives-f-for-tor-failure-while-sending-anonymous-bomb-threat/

Evading the Public Eye: On Astroturfing in Open Aviation Data

The usage of large private and business jets, from those owned by Elon Musk to Kylie Jenner and Bernard Arnault, has recently attracted considerable attention in many countries. Enabled by open and crowdsourced aircraft tracking systems based on the automatic dependent surveillance–broadcast protocol, the aircraft and their owners have been scrutinized. While the underlying technology is not novel and its privacy issues have been discussed for years, the increased attention has led to the backlash against open tracking data and, consequently, a scramble to find possible solutions to hide private jets from the public eye. In this paper, we analyze two such methods, which have not yet been discussed previously in the literature: blocking requests to web tracking platforms and malicious editing of crowdsourced databases. We draw on data from the OpenSky Network and illustrate the futility of such approaches. Finally, we outline the type of stakeholders and aircraft deploying such methods, as well as demonstrate the level of environmental impact that might have otherwise been missed by the public.

MDPI
@masor Excellent post. Not that I'm an Infosec expert, but I always cringe when I see someone using security through obscurity as *the* solution. While one certainly doesn't want to advertise their location/address/operating system/whatever - to use the the "don't look over there" concept for security is just asking for trouble.

@masor

@davetroy

In case anyone wondered why #eLoon used charter flights (which he is not paying anymore):

"Bernard Arnault realized correctly that the only privacy solution is to charter/fractional ownership."

#ElonMusk
#CharterFlights
U
https://edition.cnn.com/2022/10/19/business/bernard-arnault-sells-private-jet-over-twitter-tracking/index.html

@HistoPol @masor @davetroy exactly. If you wanted to remain anonymous, would you travel down Main Street in a small town in a neon green Bugatti Veyron, while broadcasting your name from a loudspeaker? Because that’s basically what “some people” are doing, then they wonder why they have no privacy.
@ADSBexchange @HistoPol @davetroy Indeed, in particular with the "privacy" programmes. Your excellent filters for those exactly make the point from one of these papers how these can be counterproductive -- you just light up like a Christmas tree.
@masor @ADSBexchange @HistoPol @davetroy isn't that referred to as the Barbara Streisand effect
@masor Great post.
I was on here for the past month thinking this was the place for ACARS/ADSB, but got zero uptake, so moved to @airframes Been decoding global ACARS/ADSC for about 7 years and nobody cares.
In 2022, still nobody cares about ACARS.
Bernard's rental solution is not as effective as he thinks when you factor in ACARS.
Thanks for breaking it down.
Another fantastic breakdown of it all here:
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1604033562339987456.html
Thread by @KSOSINT on Thread Reader App

@KSOSINT: With the change of Twitter policy on "doxing", the banning of accounts like @ElonJet & @ADSBexchange, and Musk's lack of understanding of plane tracking, I will explore in this thread what ADS-B is, how it ...…

@thebaldgeek @airframes Well, I/we care. Academia takes a long time but a paper also based on your collection efforts will also be published at some point! But you're of course right that it has been a very niche hobby (maybe it was better that way...)

The good thing is that contrary to the current hype, it's all a very slow-changing situation. So all analysis is still valid one, five or even ten years from now...

That said, do you find any consistent pointers about passengers via ACARS? Seems that could be easily mitigated. NB: There is real, good encryption available for it, if people cared enough.

@masor @airframes
Yikes, re-reading this in the clear light of morning, I did not mean my original reply to be so snarky!
It was a crazy day on the socials and I clearly need to slow down!
Sorry for the blunt reply.
Great to follow you here Martin.

While ADSB has been the focus, as you say, there is a solid uptake and ground swell of ACARS appreciation.
I am finding passenger names in private jets are used to ensure their car is planeside when they arrive.

Really looking forward to your paper

@masor

we certainly wouldn't want any value statements because that would be really [redacted value statement]

@ares That's how it goes. Everyone has a private opinion, of course, and we are *really* not short of those on the terrible bird site.

That said, professionally I am a computer scientist - I leave the moral philosophy and ethics to the experts. But we need to supply them with the informed facts.

@masor I like how you can put a whole thread in one go! Yay! @Mastodon ❤️❤️❤️❤️🇺🇸
@masor Infosec is everywhere. Boost if only for the (rightful) stab at #Tor.