A front page article on the Washington Post telling people how to get started with Mastodon?

That’s a big deal.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/12/17/how-to-join-mastodon/

A guide to getting started with Twitter alternative Mastodon

How to get started on social-media site Mastodon, whether you're leaving Twitter or just looking for people who have.

The Washington Post

@duane

Bezos trolling Musk?

Plus Wapo cost €250m, a fraction of what Space Karen shelled out.

@faduda @duane my first thought. This is Jeff's middle finger to Elon.
@faduda @duane do we need billionaires running media companies?
@duane Okay, but is it terrible? (I don't dare click through.)

@IPEdmonton actually no. I think it did a reasonable job of providing some clear, step-by-step instructions for people who might feel intimidated by the process. It’s beginner content aimed for people who are a little less tech-savvy and need a little hand-holding.

That’s why I think it’s a big deal. It’s a good attempt to make the whole process approachable for folks who might not otherwise make the switch. And it’s front page on the WaPo app.

@duane @IPEdmonton I think you gotta normalize or start the journalistic outlet's own domain. It would be super easy to have just your writers on a mastodon instance.

It's the Blue Checkmark of tomorrow!

@kaizoman @duane @IPEdmonton I’m not sure outlet-owned instances are the best idea. Instant verification and protection from being banned by the platform owner, yes. But what happens, e.g., to Felicia Sonmez, if she’s hosted at her (now-ex) employer?

@DirkK @kaizoman @IPEdmonton my knee-jerk reaction was “same thing that happens to your work email when you change companies” but that’s the wrong answer.

I think the right answer could be to establish a common policy between outlets that reporters can export to a new instance when they leave, regardless of circumstances.

And, I think even if we’re not sure how it would all work, it’s a good idea to try it and figure it out.

@duane @DirkK @IPEdmonton

I think that people have moved on and we know who they are. I think the fediverse offers the opportunity for those folks to have a more integrated identity, that allows them to keep who they are, no matter who they're doing it for, and they get to have the credibility of their publication when they need it.

Now that we're taking a step away from Twitter, there are so many options.

@duane surprised and pleased...but I feel these people are fleeting.
They have become accustomed to Twitterbuse. Reminds me a great deal of trump reign of terror
@Bellison22 they may well be. But it’s an encouraging sign, and they’re more likely to be fleeting if they don’t get some encouragement and positive signal along the way.
@duane @Bellison22 I think the biggest challenge for Mastodon may be the upkeep costs. People may spin up a server, get lots of sign ups, then get bored and kill the instance along with all the registered accounts and toots. Then people feels insecure and may not bother anymore. This could be a bad look for the network, but maybe my worries are overblown.

@fabioromeu @duane @Bellison22 that's sort of what happened to those of us who joined mastodon.technology.

The site owner had a family situation that demanded a lot of his time. However, he didn't just abandon the site. He followed the covenant by disabling new account creation, announcing the situation and giving people 6 months to migrate to another instance before switching to read only mode.
https://ashfurrow.com/blog/mastodon-technology-shutdown/

mastodon.technology Shutdown

Dear mastodon.technology community, I have sad news that I have decided to shut down the mastodon.technology instance. In accordance with the Mastodon Server Covenant , the server will be shut down no earlier than December 1, 2022. The server is currently having problems with intermittent availability. The cause of…

Ash Furrow
@mcrocker @duane @Bellison22 yes, but that's the responsible one. I wonder if people will do that after the heat of a shiny new thing that's getting media attention wears off, realising how laborious being an admin actually is - specially if their instance grows up a lot and their wallets start to feel the weight of it. This is why I think centralised stays over decentralised, with the latter things blip in and out of existence constantly and people dont like that.
@mcrocker @duane @Bellison22 just to be clear, I'm not saying I prefer centralised ove decentralised. Just saying that the volatility of a federated network must be taken into account when making a decision, and many don't think about that. For a big brand, for example, it could be advantageous to make their own instance and plug it into the fediverse. I like that kind of modularity.
@Bellison22 @duane it may well be the mild push to check it out and then discover you end up with a far less noisy, less confrontational feed
@duane And the reporter kindly provides a link to her Twitter account. #FacePalm
@YurkshireLad I know. Baby steps, though. It’s still encouraging.
@duane oh I know, I’m not complaining. The #irony made me chuckle.

@YurkshireLad @duane Baby steps.

To be fair, if it's a piece about how to get on mastodon, you can't really expect the readers to contact you there. Bit of a chicken and egg problem.

Kind of like the decades ago writing a piece about setting up email, and giving your email address. You might have provided a telephone number instead. Whatever the previous tech was.

@YurkshireLad @duane Well, that's where people on Twitter who haven't moved yet and want to ask things will be, isn't it . . . ?
Half cringe, sure, but if the point is to reach people not yet on Mastodon it does make a little sense.
@duane We're going to need a lot more servers.
@duane
That IS a big deal. I remember when I used to follow WP when they stood up for right and spoke up about wrong. Then something changed & they started not standing against trump and the cult. I stopped subscribing. The last couple of months I have seen them reversing and going back to being sane and with this news today, well, that is a Giant step. I like it!
@duane Now all they need is a bio of John Mastodon by Alexandra Petri
@duane is Wapo on mastodon yet?

@duane

Certainly is. Thank you for the Intel.

@duane
Sorry want to read but cannot... No subscribtion... 🤔

@Erny I can’t vouch for the link, but someone replied with what appears to be an accessible archive.

https://archive.ph/YUup2

archive.ph

@duane
Well.. I'll start reading then. 😃
Thanx
@duane if they were serious, there'd already be a WaPo instance.
@duane Is the Washington Post on Mastodon?
I can only 'find' this Washington Post Bot.
@duane
excellent and timely!

@duane

First step on the "guide"...subscribe to Washington Post (paywall).

@duane

😲 WOW.

And here I thought I could hide from the masses over here in a little corner of the internet that was peaceful.

@Mundon

@duane Very interesting; good, free advertising. Much better than a lot of the earlier articles when this all started early November.
@duane That’s why I’m here!
@danap404 @duane Welcome! Let me know if anyone here can help. There are people who have been here a long time and a LOT of us who got here within the past 6 weeks or so and who vividly remember figuring the basics out. (I’m still learning, but I like it a lot.)
@KatMA @danap404 +1 to that. I’m a recent move as well, but lots of folks are around to help you get sorted out.
@KatMA @danap404 @duane I have a question if you don’t mind, is it possible to change servers to a more active/less bogged one?
@duane Yes to decentralization!
@duane I think the media outlets setting up their own instances is a no brainer
@duane They should stand up their own instance and really get this going...
@duane
Unfortunately, it's behind their paywall. Public access would be better, but I'll take what I can get.
@duane now i know the reason, why twitter feels insecure
@duane And not even paywalled.
@duane That is an awesome article. Thanks for sharing!

@duane

It took me awhile, but I'm ok with it now.