#Backblaze B2 is a pretty cheap cloud storage alternative to Amazon's S3.

I've been using it to backup my personal Dropbox archive, currently storing 289.5 GB in it for $1.7 per month (not sure if the file versioning counts in that reported size).

You can also serve those files from behind #Cloudflare, which I'll probably start doing for my #Mastodon storage needs:

https://www.backblaze.com/blog/free-image-hosting-with-cloudflare-transform-rules-and-backblaze-b2/

I'd add a Cache-Control header, though, as it doesn't serve one.

#ProductRecommendations #mastodadmin

Free Image Hosting With Cloudflare Transform Rules and Backblaze B2

By serving your images via Cloudflare’s global CDN and optimizing your cache configuration you will incur no download costs.

Backblaze Blog | Cloud Storage & Cloud Backup
@alexelcu wonder how it compares to #cloudflares own offering #r2 https://www.cloudflare.com/products/r2/
Cloudflare R2 | Zero Egress Distributed Object Storage | Cloudflare

Cloudflare R2 is an S3-compatible, zero egress-fee, globally distributed object storage. Move data freely and build the multi-cloud architecture you desire.

Cloudflare
@softinio I don't know.

@softinio Cost per storage is cheaper than Cloudflare R2, and there's egress pricing, but it doesn't apply if you place Cloudflare in front of your Backblaze bucket.

OTOH, I think an extra cost would be the cost per transactions. I don't know which one is cheaper, and unfortunately, I think it's very relevant in the case of Mastodon, since you end up uploading and deleting a lot of files.

I see that uploading 1 GB of cache costs $0.3...

@softinio ... it's cheap, doesn't break the bank, but if I'd connect to the firehose (a relay server), it might be significant. Versus zero for the local SSD volume. Also, I/O will be slower.

For now I'm pausing the migration. Will settle for a backup of non-cache files instead.