I'm happy to announce we have this new article in Nature, discussing policies and challenges for a just transition. "Degrowth can work - here's how science can help": https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-04412-x
Degrowth can work — here’s how science can help

Wealthy countries can create prosperity while using less materials and energy if they abandon economic growth as an objective.

@jasonhickel I'm wondering why you guys "never" cite hard boundaries of raw material & #mining in introduction to papers. Eg., Watari 2020 https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acs.est.0c02471#
or Watari 2020 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344919305750

or Bringezu 2019 https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/8/3/140/htm

These hard boundaries together with time/CO2 budget explain the inevitability of #Degrowth.

Are you assuming everyone knows it and a mention of these very real physical constraints and hard project deadlines doesn't add weight to our cause?

@jks

@jasonhickel @jks

Mention of the constraints in the introduction to your new publication would had saved us a lot of comments like "whoa, they want to degrow construction sector and steel?!! Are they mad?!"

People don't know that there are material limits on a finite planet or that the time constraint from CO2 budget forbids the attitude of "It'll be okay if enough metals r available in 2055. Until then, we'll just wait and do BAU."

#Degrowth #Postgrowth #PlanetaryBoundaries #MaterialUse