Here on the call with the #RhodeIsland Executive Climate Change Coordinating Council for the meeting to approve the 2022 Update to the state's greenhouse gas emissions reductions plan. RI Department of Environmental Management Director Terry Gray is noting the high level of engagement here, both from state agencies & the public.

Notably, one state agency is not engaged with this plan, at least not in a constructive way: RIDOT. /1

#climatecrisis

First item is an update to the GHG inventory, showing 2019 emissions (these lag by three years due to EPA data). #RhodeIsland does a pretty good job of presenting graphics for these. Notably, transportation was the largest sector and now is an even larger share, at 39.7%, and transportation emissions are increasing.

Also, if you add residential heating and commercial heating, that's another 28%.

Ergo, the transportation and thermal sectors are critical. /2

In fact, transport emissions went up 8.8% from 2016 through 2019, due to increases in vehicle miles traveled. This should be seen in light of RIDOT's work to expand highways and to fight attempts to build bicycle, pedestrian, and active mobility infrastructure. /3
Another interesting detail is that the new inventory is accounting for all the #renewableenergy credits that the state's utilities bought. These are meaningful for reducing regional greenhouse gas emissions, but that they do not directly relate to state emissions. As we move into deeper decarbonization, this will become a bigger issue; as we will still be running natural gas and heating oil plants in this state. /4

We are now to the 2022 update to the state's greenhouse gas emissions reductions plan; the last update was in 2016. The emphasis here is largely on the 2025 plan (which is frankly too late).

EC4 Chair Gray notes that nearly 400 sets of written comments have been received on EC4's climate change plan, and that they have taken this into account.

Notably, they started showing high-level modeling results to show policy impacts - but only last week.
/5

"Transportation stands out as the highest emitter, and that there is a lot of work in that sector." - EC4 Chair Terry Gray

I would say that there is wildly inadequate work in that sector, particularly around vehicle miles traveled reductions. /6

Here are the stated transportation sector goals. Notably, the 10% target is inadequate.

"Alignment of future transportation funding with the Transit Master Plan and the Bike Mobility Master Plan" is notable, as these projects are not in the STIP.

This is also putting a pretty positive spin on the language that it actually in the report. /7

They've been talking for 35 minutes now; there are 37 people on this call, and I'm wondering if they will get around to actually taking public comment from all of those who wish to speak.

Of course, if they wanted public comment, they wouldn't have held this meeting at 1 PM on a Thursday. /8

We're on public comment now; Timmons Roberts of Brown University's climate and development lab is now commenting; notes that the state has not updated its modeling and that we only have seven years to reach the 2030 target.

Hank Webster of Acadia Center notes that the state has been doing well in terms of updating its plans as comments come in. This is true; given that a new version of the plan was introduced *yesterday*. /9

https://climatechange.ri.gov/act-climate/working-draft-workplan

Review the Working Draft of the 2022 Update | Climate Change

Hank Webster argues that we should implement an all-electric building code and #electrifyeverything. Notes that Massachusetts is already allowing communities to move on this.

Also echoes support for making the Transit Master Plan and Bike Mobility Plan. Notes that the language that this is "not possible" has been removed, but that the language is still vague on funding these plans. Also notes that the state government has the authority to promulgate authority to reduce emissions. /10

Hank also notes that the language by the state that we "can't fund" the Transit Master Plan and the Bike Mobility Plan has been removed in the most recent version.

This was a win by advocates, but we need to be sure that the recalcitrant agencies (RIDOT, Statewide Planning) are still held accountable for implementing these plans.

Providence City Council-elect Sue Anderbois is now commenting.
/11

Notes that transportation is 40% of emissions, and that we have robust plans with the Transit Master Plan and the Bike Mobility Plan, and that we need to implement them now.

Larry Chretien from Green Energy Consumers Alliance is on the call. Describes the 38.4% emissions reductions are "not good enough." Notes that we need a plan to reduce emissions 45% *now*, so that we can implement. "We're running out of time." /12

Chretien notes that he supports Acadia Center's proposal that we move to making new buildings all-electric. Also says that he wants more funding for EC4. "It's going to take a lot of people power to get this done... you need to put it on the governor to provide more resources."

Next up: @urbanhiker with Providence Streets. Has been car-free since 2015; echoes the call to fully fund the Bike Mobility Plan and Transit Master Plan. /13

@urbanhiker also notes that we need more updated data collection. "We need more information about bicycle mobility and pedestrian mobility to effect mode shift.... the plans that are coming into the pipeline for the TAC today need to be funded."

Roughly: People like us are the greenest people in the state. You don't want to kill us, because we are part of meeting state goals. /14

Kathleen Gannon, chair of Rhode Island Bicycle Coalition is up next: "we share a moral obligation to make progress on the #climatecrisis... our children and grandchildren will have to deal with this. We must stand up to this challenge or bear the moral consequences."

Notes that the targets on the Act on Climate are not flexible. "I think it is unconscionable to be disregarding the contributions of the climate mobility plan and the Bike Mobility Plan." /15

"We urge you to recommend moving the plans from the Bicycle Mobility Plan and the Transit Master Plan into the State Transportation Improvement Plan."

Barry Schiller, former transportation director for Rhode Island Sierra Club. Cites the climate benefits from living in compact neighborhoods adjacent to city centers, as opposed to sprawl development.

"Transportation policy drives a lot of land use, and it seems to me that transportation policy is doing the opposite." /16

Notes that for Northeast Corridor travel we should be using Amtrak. Wants to draw attention to the state leading by example not only by electrifying its fleet.

@dariaphoebe next: the electric vehicle targeting of 10% is not enough; but should be targeting a larger share of vehicles. Stating that you are still seeking funding for transit and bike plans shows the lack of prioritization of those plans." /17

Made my comments. Back to my day job. /18/end
PS: great comments @dariaphoebe and @urbanhiker! You two were amazing.
@croselund 👏👏👏
@moldybasil Thanks! This was all possible because we've been organizing, showing up, and changing the narrative. Your comments at the TAC were part of that, so applause right back at ya.