Christine Lemmer-Webber (@cwebber) described ChatGPT as Mansplaining As A Service, and honestly I can’t think of a better description. A service that instantly generates vaguely plausible sounding yet totally fabricated and baseless lectures in an instant with unflagging confidence in its own correctness on any topic, without concern, regard or even awareness of the level of expertise of its audience.
@patrizia @andrewfeeney @kevlin @cwebber no, Patricia, no! Let me correct you!
Just kidding, also deliberate mispell for the sake of demonstration. Sorry, hope you get it.
Also: with this post I passed the “I am not a robot” captcha test.
@patrizia @andrewfeeney @kevlin @cwebber and has no ego if you tell it it's wrong, and it can't fire you.
I kinda love it. It's like, we all hate having someone yell at us and boss us around, but we also *pay* personal trainers to do exactly that.
As long as we're in control, and we decide whether to follow the advice, #chatGPT is a fantastic tool.
I *do* worry about having its outputs emitted willy-nilly into the world as if they came from a human, or trusted as such. That's some scary shit.
@pbrane @patrizia @andrewfeeney @kevlin @cwebber
It definitely gives the impression of an ego if you tell it that it's wrong. It tends to stick to its guns in a passive aggressive style: "sorry if I was wrong and new information may come to light but there's no evidence for X" when you just told it it's wrong about that.
@dyedgrey @patrizia @andrewfeeney @kevlin @cwebber I... don't think this thing is there "just so some engineers can claim '10% more clever'". I think ChatGPT is an amazing breakthrough and is genuinely useful.
I also think it has to be treated really really carefully, as yes, it can produce vast quantities of fake news, bad answers, etc.
The invention of dynamite lead to lots of weapons of destruction. It is also genuinely useful, industrially.
But I agree: we should not forget the harms.
@patrizia @kevlin @andrewfeeney @cwebber @pbrane
Its *incorrect* outputs emitted onto an ignorant and unprepared world of users who might use unwisely use them.
I’m surely missing a key piece of information but, my own interactions with the machine and the results it has produced, as of today do not justify any kind of paid subscription (and apparently they’re planning a stock offer as well?…)
@vanderZwan @kevlin @patrizia @cwebber
My first thought was: Determining the natural order of these given adjectives is actually the exact problem for which ingesting the entire internet into a generative model would be the insanely over-engineered but near perfect solution. Let's try it!
My second thought, after trying it, was that the results were ... inconclusive.
@vanderZwan @kevlin @patrizia @cwebber
Okay fine, I'll give it this one. My prompt was wanting.
@andrewfeeney @vanderZwan @kevlin @[email protected] This video on the subject of adjectival ordering is worth watching :)
CppCon 2018: Borislav Stanimirov 'The Bad Big Wolf Meets Riding Hood Little Red' - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dw0UBuTKHHg

http://CppCon.org—Presentation Slides, PDFs, Source Code and other presenter materials are available at: https://github.com/CppCon/CppCon2018—Lightning Talk—...
@patrizia @andrewfeeney @kevlin @cwebber
Just don't check the "Actually..." option in Settings. 😆
@andrewfeeney @kevlin @[email protected]
> Mansplaining As A Service
No wonder ChatGPT is so popular on HackerNews!
@andrewfeeney @kevlin @cwebber
The original name was in fact "Ack-ChatGPT-yually"