As the term 'intelligence' is used in 'artificial intelligence', it is perhaps worth asking, what kind of intelligence do AI systems represent? Confident and detail focused, but naïve, easily misled and lacking in common sense, worldliness, situational awareness, fairness, imagination, empathy, emotional intelligence and social intelligence 🤔

@kevlin

Christine Lemmer-Webber (@cwebber) described ChatGPT as Mansplaining As A Service, and honestly I can’t think of a better description. A service that instantly generates vaguely plausible sounding yet totally fabricated and baseless lectures in an instant with unflagging confidence in its own correctness on any topic, without concern, regard or even awareness of the level of expertise of its audience.

@andrewfeeney @kevlin @cwebber At least it only does so when *asked*!

@patrizia @andrewfeeney @kevlin @cwebber and has no ego if you tell it it's wrong, and it can't fire you.

I kinda love it. It's like, we all hate having someone yell at us and boss us around, but we also *pay* personal trainers to do exactly that.

As long as we're in control, and we decide whether to follow the advice, #chatGPT is a fantastic tool.

I *do* worry about having its outputs emitted willy-nilly into the world as if they came from a human, or trusted as such. That's some scary shit.

@pbrane @patrizia @andrewfeeney @kevlin @cwebber But we're not in control - a prompter might be at the moment of generation, but then once its output is used in articles, posts, papers and entertainment, the audience has very little to no control over it. It's similar to troll and bot farms in that respect. Not everyone has been directly influenced, meaning it's very hard for them to know they have been _indirectly_ influenced, ie through friends, family, and even the media, who were directly.