Alas, we do not detect piRNAs in Day 6 mPGCLCs. https://www.cell.com/developmental-cell/fulltext/S1534-5807(22)00783-3
#piRNAs #GermCells #mPGC #mPGCLC #DevCell #MattersArising
It seems this is understandable as mPGCLCs share an ~E9.5 mPGC transcriptome & small-RNAome.
With pathway members absent, piRNA biogenesis is unlikely.
Fetal piRNAs emerge later in vivo at E13.5 onwards upon further demethylation and robust upregulation of piRNA pathway members.
Although this was a protracted journey since 2017, I’m very grateful that, Wolf Reik’s lab relooked at the original data in von Meyenn et al 2016 and graciously corrected a mistake with their small RNA data.
Lots went on behind the scenes – but this is an instance of science working well! https://www.cell.com/developmental-cell/fulltext/S1534-5807(22)00809-7
So, will we have a mammalian in vitro fetal piRNA model?
Ishikura et al 2021’s reaggregated rTestis m5/7 cells and gonocyte-like cells (GSCLCs) look v. promising, with marked fetal piRNA pathway upregulation.
It appears that PGCLCs stall in development likely due to an incorrect physical & signalling environment in EBs.
See Cooke & Moris (2021) for an excellent discussion on the mechanics and extra-cellular cues of this differentiation
Summary: This Review summarises recent research revealing that primordial germ cell (PGC) development depends on interactions with the surrounding somatic cells and tissues, and that this co-development is crucial for PGC specification, migration and maturation.