If you were unfortunate enough to e-file your US #tax using HR Block, Taxact or Taxslayer, your most sensitive financial information was nonconsenually shared with Facebook, where it was added to the involuntary dossier the company maintains billions of people, including people who don't have Facebook accounts.

1/

A blockbuster investigation from *The Markup* and *The Verge* reveals that major tax-prep services illegally embedded the Facebook tracking pixel in their sites, configured so that it transmitted as much data as possible to the surveillance giant.

https://www.theverge.com/2022/11/22/23471842/facebook-hr-block-taxact-taxslayer-info-sharing

In their defense, the companies say that they didn't know that they were sending all this data to Facebook, and that they were using Facebook's #surveillance pixel to "deliver a more personalized customer experience."

2/

Facebook has been receiving users’ financial info from tax preparers

The Markup found that tax preparation services including TaxAct, TaxSlayer, and H&R Block have sent users’ personal financial information to Facebook through the Meta Pixel.

The Verge

The companies had set the Facebook tracking pixel to use "automatic advanced matching," which scours any page it's embedded in for personally identifying information to harvest and transmit to Facebook.

https://www.facebook.com/business/help/611774685654668?id=1205376682832142

Facebook claims that it doesn't want this data and won't use it, though the company has been previously caught violating fair finance laws by using finance data to discriminate against Black families:

https://www.cnbc.com/2022/06/21/doj-settles-with-facebook-over-allegedly-discriminatory-housing-ads.html

3/

Log in or sign up to view

See posts, photos and more on Facebook.

But it's possible that Facebook isn't using this data - or that it doesn't know whether it's using this data. Facebook's own internal audits show that the company doesn't know what data it collects or how it uses it:

https://www.vice.com/en/article/akvmke/facebook-doesnt-know-what-it-does-with-your-data-or-where-it-goes

Remember, Facebook claims that it collects your data based on your consent; somehow it thinks that you can consent to collecting and using your data in ways that even Facebook can't describe.

4/

Facebook Doesn’t Know What It Does With Your Data, Or Where It Goes: Leaked Document

“We do not have an adequate level of control and explainability over how our systems use data,” Facebook engineers say in leaked document.

As infuriating as Facebook's role in this data theft is, the real scandal is that Americans have to pay for tax preparation *at all*. In most of the world's wealthy countries, the tax authorities send taxpayers a precompleted tax-return every year. You can modify this return (on your own or with the help of a tax-prep professional), or you can just mail it back. For free.

5/

This makes sense. The tax authorities already know how much you've made. They know what deductions you're entitled to. It is surreal that you have to pay a professional to fill in a form to tell the #IRS a bunch of things it already know about you.

6/

Every attempt to bring free tax prep to America has been scuttled by an unholy alliance of anti-tax extremists like #GroverNordquist (a sadist who wants to make paying your tax as cumbersome and painful as possible) and the multi-billion-dollar, highly concentrated tax-prep industry.

7/

Companies like HR Block and Intuit have spent millions lobbying against free tax prep. It's money well spent, because tax prep makes billions for these companies. The biggest tax prep companies formed something called "the #FreeFileAlliance" that purported to offer free tax-prep to low- and medium-income Americans.

8/

In practice, "free filing" turned out to be a marketing funnel that tricked people into paying for services they were entitled to get for free. Intuit alone stole billions this way:

https://pluralistic.net/2022/02/24/uber-for-arbitration/#nibbled-to-death-by-ducks

The #monopolists who run America's tax-prep services claim that "government can't do anything well" and insist that the private sector will bring "efficiencies" to tax-prep.

9/

Pluralistic: 24 Feb 2022 – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

In reality, these companies literally have no idea what they're doing - they don't know what data they're collecting, nor who they're sharing it with.

Same goes for Facebook. Companies that are not disciplined by competition or regulation don't have to be good at their jobs. These companies' major competence is lobbying Congress to prevent the passage of meaningful privacy laws and laws that would save Americans billions through IRS-prepared tax-returns.

10/

As Harvard tax-law prof Mandi Matlock told Simon Fondrie-Teitler, Angie Waller, and Colin Lecher, this #DataValdez is the "almost inevitable consequence of relying on for-profit companies to handle a government requirement. It’s a process that provides users little choice but to hand over their data to Facebook if they want to comply with the law."

11/

File:HAL9000.svg - Wikimedia Commons

@pluralistic PSA: The IRS actually has a program called VITA where they provide grants and training for volunteer tax preparers to assist folks making under $60k in filing their taxes for free. As long as you meet the income requirements, they can handle some pretty complex tax situations. It's been a few years since I volunteered, but I recall one year when the organizer sent us a summary showing how many millions of dollars of tax refunds we had processed that otherwise would have gone through these predatory companies. It was a good feeling.

https://www.irs.gov/individuals/free-tax-return-preparation-for-qualifying-taxpayers

Free tax return preparation for qualifying taxpayers | Internal Revenue Service

The IRS Volunteer Income Tax Assistance (VITA) and the Tax Counseling for the Elderly (TCE) programs prepare tax returns for free for qualifying taxpayers.

@pluralistic Jeez bie, click the little globe on your threaded replies to get that "Unlisted" icon. Blowing me up here!
@cjbooker In most of my threads all toots after the first are already unlisted; you have misunderstood how "unlisting" works (unlisted toots are hidden only for nonfollowers on the same instance, not followers). As noted in my bio, I post long threads from this account and there are many ways to get my essays if you don't like my Mastodon style - RSS, newsletter, Medium, Tumblr, a blog, etc. I recommend unfollowing me here and subscribing to one of those if you prefer. Links at pluralistic.net.
@pluralistic @cjbooker is there anything I can do do at my end (web/tusky) such that only the first post in a thread will display? Otherwise I see all all posts from a thread in reverse chronological order as a block in my timeline.
@denyerec @pluralistic Honestly not sure. I just took the advice and unfollowed because yeah, it's not something I see a graceful solution for.

@denyerec @pluralistic @cjbooker

Definitely a Mastodon misfeature... this needs to change.

@tasket @denyerec @pluralistic @cjbooker On the web, I clicked the first post of the thread and the rest appeared in order in the resulting column. That doesn't solve the reverse-order thread in the timeline, but it makes reading it make sense.

@skry @tasket @pluralistic @cjbooker Indeed there's no issue once you tap any of the thread entries - just the timeline appearance.

Perhaps there's a Mastodon specific way of doing it, or perhaps they're just not that far down their to do list :)

@denyerec @skry @tasket @pluralistic @cjbooker The Mastodon way to do it is to make only the first post public and the remaining posts unlisted. It’s generally considered good practice to make your replies unlisted as well unless your intent is to bring a post to your followers’ attention. Some apps provide functionality for the latter, but I don’t know of any that do the former yet. You can also just make all posts unlisted by default so you can select which ones show up in follower timelines.

@denyerec @skry @pluralistic @cjbooker

There's an issue because anyone who follows a person who makes lengthy threads will have their own TL inundated – it's all or nothing.

@pluralistic jeezluoise! 2022 should be listed as the year of “I Didn’t Know”
@pluralistic I believe this FOR SURE…. holding on for when it’ll be profitable or how to make it so/sell it so/build it so 🤬😶‍🌫️🙄
@pluralistic that first sentence is so Adam Curtis I involuntarily read it in his voice.

@pluralistic

the greatest lie the devil ever told was that capitalism would sacrifice even a tiny percentage of its ability to overcharge in order to provide "efficiencies" to consumers.

@pluralistic In Europe, things work pretty well on that matter. The government contracts technology services based on requirements and manage all the processes; the private sector delivers the technology and ensures it works based on contractual requirements but doesn't get involved directly with service delivery to citizens.
@pluralistic the private sector almost never brings efficiencies. How could they? They are literally a middle man.
@pluralistic I had used TaxAct, as from what I could tell they didn't lobby the government this way. But here they are in on this data invasion! Previously I had used CreditKarma for the same reason, but they were bought by Intuit. Is there any US tax preparation firm that is just an honest business?
@pluralistic I would also like to add that these tax prep companies have convinced most people that they cannot do their taxes themselves. I surprise people when I tell them I do my own forms and mail them. Why spend $100 to file when 1-2 stamps will do the trick? "Fast Refunds" may be appealing, but the "refund anticipation loans" were the real scam. (And illegal in some states...)
@pluralistic does the US have a body to assess the bureaucracy impact of new laws?
@pluralistic so true. I'm Swedish we declare our taxes on the phone. It takes me 15 minutes. It takes my American friends 5-10 weeks.

@pluralistic in the Netherlands, I paid an accountant to do my taxes for the year I bought a house. The deductible elements weren’t always clear.

I quite enjoy the difference from Canada. Even though doing taxes in Canada wasn’t particularly difficult with primarily salary income.

@pluralistic @xinit maybe I’m misunderstanding, but are you saying that you prefer needing to pay a professional to do your taxes?

@baberiel_d @pluralistic ever done taxes in a language you aren’t fully fluent in?

I can read Dutch pretty well, but the more advanced operations where tens of thousands of euros are potentially on the line, I’m willing to splurge.

Especially when most years are:

“Oh, it’s time to do my taxes”
Log into tax agency web site using MFA
“Yeah, that looks good”
Click okay

Dutch payslips and notary receipts look like someone scattered random numbers.

@baberiel_d @pluralistic now that that house purchase is out of the way, click click click next year.
@xinit Makes sense 👍

@baberiel_d the first year we filed, I got a letter from them saying something like “the payment of €X should take place soon”

But it was unclear if the payment was to be made TO us or FROM us. We ran it past native speakers and they weren’t sure either. So, I’m suspicious ;)

@xinit 😂 that difference matters a lot!
@pluralistic on Brazil, our Income Tax is done on computer since the 1990s, and we do this via Internet since 2000. And since last year you can do it on cellphones and cloud and sync everything before send it back filled
@fabiocosta0305 @pluralistic likewise in Australia. The official software is free, simple enough, web-based, and pre-filled with income data from employer, banks etc. There are paper forms you can use but nobody does.
@fabiocosta0305 @pluralistic and the Tax Office's database was available for sale at a flea market in São Paulo... 😂
@pluralistic Facebook is an Elder God and the left tentacles don’t know what the right tentacles are doing. The tentacles on its back just want to be left out of the whole ordeal.
@Widgett @pluralistic Sounds like you are describing the US government.
@longobord @pluralistic Big difference is: *their* back tentacles are all in.
@Widgett I am quite sure that a many parts of the government very much do not want anything to do with that other lot. (Although I do wish SCOTUS had kept with tradition and been in that group.)