EDIT: DO NOT BOOST!

This post is nearly a year old, and boosting will simply spread misinformation. Mastodon now has substantially more funding, and has enough scale to handle its many users.

I would delete this post but my server is not letting me so I'm editing this to reflect that I wish for you to NOT BOOST!

---
Right now Mastodon is only receiving appr. $21,000/month through Patreon.

This is not enough to handle the 1 million new accounts that will be made this week.

Currently, only 4,720 patrons are donating to Mastodon.

However, if everyone chips in $2/month, this will ensure the continued survival of Mastodon!

Be a hero! Donate now! https://www.patreon.com/mastodon
Get more from Mastodon on Patreon

Creating Mastodon

Patreon
Also, if it's not already clear: donate to the instance that hosts you. This will also help out a lot!
@atomicpoet if I can only pick one, which will have the biggest impact?
@squee On you or the Fediverse as a whole?
@atomicpoet the fediverse. Support my instance or the whole idea?
@atomicpoet I already asks my admin, and he said it's fine, but I'm so worried 😔
@atomicpoet I would if there was a Ko-Fi account where I could pay when I can instead of paying every month, which I can't really do.
@atomicpoet second stupid question: where to lookup the instance.
@atomicpoet I just signed up but I have no idea his to donate to my server!
@atomicpoet you might want to add a sarcasm tag
@Rairii I'm not being sarcastic. Mastodon is a non-profit, and doesn't currently have the resources to replace potentially 100,000,000s of Twitter migrants. It needs funding, new staff, and moderation for the instances that it runs.
@atomicpoet no, be a hero by not enabling a supernode to grow even larger on the network. spread out on other instances.
@opal Read my other posts. I've already been telling people to spread out. Nevertheless, Mastodon needs more funding.
@atomicpoet i can't read your posts when you fucking decide to block me, dumbass. and no, eugen does not need funding.
@atomicpoet all i gather from this thread is that you're awful at communicating your intents. everyone was confused by what you said. you made a mistake, own up to it instead of getting pissed at everyone else.
@opal What is wrong with you?
@fredoB how am i supposed to answer that? you seem to have made up your mind about me already, so why bother?
@fredoB and i don't use mastodon at all
@opal @atomicpoet this employs the developers who work on the core software plus two of the instances
@moh_kohn @atomicpoet i don't use mastodon or those two instances so i have zero stake in their success
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the burden of those new accounts will mainly fall on server admins, will it not?
@evan Clarify what this question is about.
"Right now Mastodon is only receiving appr. $21,000/month through Patreon.

This is not enough to handle the 1 million new accounts that will be made this week."

I guess I am confused how new accounts affect the resources needed by Mastodon, since it runs in distributed infrastructure
@evan @atomicpoet
Evan, you are right that the huge influx of new users puts a lot of burden on the instance admins right now and they need support (donations) for the server upgrades.
At the same the Mastodon software development, improvement and security also takes a lot of effort and also relies on donations.

@atomicpoet Why should the Mastodon server network (not to mention the wider Fediverse) cease to work with more accounts on Mastodon.social, the overflown instance of the main dev? This make no sense whatsoever.

Yes, donate to the Mastodon development team.
But first donate to your instance!

@atomicpoet Also donate to the admin of your instance! Donating directly to Mastodon will help the developers and the people who run the few "flagship" instances like mastodon.social and mastodon.online but it won't help all the other instances people are flocking to.

👏donate👏to👏your👏admins

@jorgecandeias @atomicpoet

The "donations model" is not sustainable both in the short-term burst of arrivals and the long term.

You can only go so far, leveraging on volunteers. They will accommodate some of those users.

But I think VIP instances that charge for speed, quality, and instant access are needed. A euro per month (or so) per incoming user paid annually would fund those paid servers.

Believing Twitter's user base can be accommodated "as is" is insane.

Already paid Patreon myself

@jorgecandeias @atomicpoet

I self-host my instance and have a few friends in there for the ride (less than 20)... it's a great experience, unlike being bundled into a system stretched to its limits.

In time they will move, either by picking up some great alternative instance or set up their own.

@atomicpoet

I’m quite confused. I joined the @mastonon.Green server and have been looking for how to donate to support it. No luck but may be looking in the wrong place.

Is this a way of donating to support ALL servers? How does it work?

@atomicpoet @Fascinatorfun Your server’s admin is @JohanEmpa . He’s got details on how to donate.
@sef @JohanEmpa
got it. Thanks. Set up a SO!
@Fascinatorfun
Thank you and welcome as a member 😃
@Fascinatorfun No, it's just for the one guy and the single-person-board company he created. Not for the other local servers.
@atomicpoet which instance are you tooting about?
@atomicpoet just joined the $10/month tier.
@atomicpoet I don't really think this is a matter of survival. $21.000 should be plenty of money for mastodon to go about really. The Problem here is not that the users are coming to the fediverse.

The problem rather is the users tend to register on the bigger instances like mastodon.social, which is unsustainable.

The effort should really go to spread the users out through this federated network
@stefan $21,000 is not enough to build an app that replaces Twitter.
@atomicpoet as you can see it is. Building the app is really the cheaper thing tbh. I would bet most of the money goes into hosting. From $21.000 a month you can easily found a few devs.
@atomicpoet Another factor is also that patreon certainly is not their only revenue stream. Its just a guess but I am fairly mastodon also got some government funds here and there as well.

I don't the software mastodon really has a problem with funding. We don't really know which other revenue streams the company has (especially from other donations that are not patreon)

If you want your money to help the fediverse I would advise helping your server-admin out with their bills to keep the servers up. I am pretty sure Eugen is fine for now.
@stefan @atomicpoet
Stefan, I think there is nothing wrong with having a very big Mastodon instance in the fediverse.
For one thing that will add to the development of better scaling Mastodon instances, with benefits for all Mastodon admins.
If your worry is that one Mastodon instance will get too dominant, then I don’t share your worry. Users can and will migrate to other instances if that benefits them.
With this trend, scaling is key.
@smhoekstra @atomicpoet Well I mean there is certain stuff that kicks in when you have such a big instance really. Having one huge instance kinda goes against the goals of the fediverse of being a *federated* network. The idea really is to have lots of small (maybe medium-sized) instances that share the load of the network and distribute. Way harder to take down a proper federated sevice fully.

Also you could clearly see in the last weeks what impact a big instance even has on smaller ones. Flooding them with activities when stuff happens. Also being generally slow since hardware would not keep-up with demand.

For me instances should not really scale over a certain limit. It just centalizes stuff to much taking away what makes the fediverse great.

Also it is not a fear that an instance gets to dominant. It is a thing. mastodon. social is a powerhouse in this portion of the federated microblogging services. So they certainly can excert pressure on smaller instances, especially since that is a "flagship instance" (Though I can't think of a concrete example right now).

You could a whole other route instead of scaling one instance to just scale on the network and get more nodes online so users spread out. Thats the way I would prefer really
@Politikos ☝️mastodon n’est pas une app centralisée comme twitter, faisons la promotion d’un réseau décentralisé en expliquant que chaque instance indépendante a besoin de soutien. Ce sont ces petits serveurs qui portent le poids des nouveaux utilisateurs. Pas le proprio/main dev de mastodon. Il faut éviter de refaire l’erreur de twitter en s’inscrivant tous sur une seule même grande instance.
@atomicpoet do you accept the impoverished £Sterling? 🤔😂
@atomicpoet remeber that you should chip in to the server that's hosting your account, the donation to Mastodon is great, but that doesn't help keep the individual servers alive
@thalrex Yep, already said that.
@atomicpoet My bad! the threading view isn't always that intuitive
@atomicpoet How does the money get to all the independently hosted instances?
@jasongorman Every instance that runs Mastodon benefits from continued developments and improvements that the Mastodon non-profit makes to its code.

For example, there was a recent update that allowed users to edit their posts. That's a big deal.
@atomicpoet And who pays for the hosting?
@jasongorman @atomicpoet the one who hosted it. Many of these and have a homepage and a donation link. ;)