I wrote a thread about Mastodon on Twitter, it needs to be read.
https://twitter.com/pati_gallardo/status/1590485665535643649?s=46&t=hpE2Unzsn-9qKirLfo3tYA
Patricia Aas 🐢🏳️‍🌈 on Twitter

“Ok fine. I have tried to hold my tongue, but there is a line, and when Mastodon folks threaten BIPOC people with getting blocked for not Content Warning when they talk about racism… I need to get real with y’all. 🧵”

Twitter

@patricia thanks for writing this.

Folks here on #Mastodon should read this, and take this seriously.
Clearly, there's a culture around how things are done here at Mastodon, but maybe there is a better way to teach folks about that culture instead of blocking/banning folks outright.

If #Mastadon is to be a place for well-meaning folks on the internet, threatening people may not be the best way forward.

And it is hard to know who means well, but @[email protected]'s call out is pretty clear cut #IMHO

an instance where "well-meaning" is not clear-cut:

I have refrained from posting anything about last night's elections here in the US, because I know I would be dinged about CWs. That makes me not want to post about elections/politics.

That does not feel very free-speech-y.

But I can also easily imagine discourse around US politics and elections getting out of hand (as intentioned by the OP), so a CW may not be a bad idea for all things politics (?). I dunno!

@krishnavp Hi, I'm a little confused by your post. If you're worried about getting dinged for CWs for posting on US politics. Why not just add "US politics" as the CW? Why refrain from posting instead?
@diego it’s about friction (one more thing to do when posting) and my want to be in people’s good graces (and generally not wanting to upset/bother folks)🙂
a CW (for me) implies something that may upset folks … I guess. Eg, I get that folks find US politics unappealing or triggering.
So why would I want to post about something, which even I admit may bother someone … even if it comes with a CW?
So I refrain. Unless I feel really strong about it. So in some ways, it’s a good thing? Not sure.

@krishnavp @diego

I had a similar experience when I first joined. I had someone thought police me about not wrapping a post about UK politics in a CW. It stung. I just wanted freedom to express myself.

But when I read the guy's post with a clear head what he was actually telling me was that he wanted to be able to scroll through things faster, and return to #UKPolitics posts when he had time to digest them in one go.

Seems to historically be a thing here.

@mackaj @krishnavp @diego exactly this. It gives you the option to dip in and out of topics at your leisure. Politics especially can raise the blood pressure.

@benmcfc @mackaj @diego I take the lessons here. Nothing against CWs or their usage. And I agree that social media and politics mix poorly.

how far do you take it with the CW policing though? Pretty sure someone will think that this thread should have been under a CW. ⚠️

Here’s how I see it most days: Any social system needs rules, but also the tolerance for bending and breaking those rules — like English and it’s grammar 🤣

@krishnavp @mackaj @diego yep! Absolutely. There will be a learning curve too. People need to cut people some slack for sure.

Also, on English:
https://mastodon.scot/@Freyalyn/109321852456050420 😅

Freyalyn 🍁 🍂 🍃 🍄 🌻 (@[email protected])

“The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that English is about as pure as a cribhouse whore. We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary.” #TerryPratchett, who can always be relied upon for saying really interesting things that are true*. *For a given value of true. ETA - I have been corrected; this is quoted from James D Nicholl.

mastodon.scot

@benmcfc

Haha, I love that James D Nicholl quite. So true. Thanks for the link.

@krishnavp @diego