This is a thread.

I left Twitter years ago because it a principal catalyst in destroying my mental health. I came back because I made my living on social media, largely by being a "bluecheck."

Going back was not great. Elon showing up to accidentally destroy it was the perfect moment for me to leave for good, so I did.

I set up a new Mastodon account on a new instance and had a great time with about 350 mutuals (people I followed that followed me as well).

1/X

I fell in love with Mastodon in this time. There wasn't a lot going on, so I could go days without checking in. It really helped me deal with compulsive cycles of social media usage.

But more than that, there was a culture around mental health here. People were intentional about not turning their feeds into a torrent of neurological activation. CWs offered a respite and became the norm because so many people here are disabled, queer, have mental illness, etc.

2/x

But, I also noticed despite all the intersections of identity that could function here in a way that could not on corporately controlled platforms, the Fediverse in general, and Mastodon in particular, were incredibly white.

That is always an alarm bell for me as someone who has committed their life to the work of antiracism.

3/x

The strange thing about Mastodon being so white the that the origins of the Fediverse, both in code and in culture, come from black, queer, and trans people.

So, being an autistic nerd, I started researching and studying. I took enormous effort to identity BIPOC across the fediverse and follow them, so I could learn about their unique experiences here.

I learned many things, but only one of the is directly salient to this thread.

4/x

CWs (Content Warnings) are the mechanism that allow me to function here with my mental health challenges. AND they are something that have been used to justify tone policing, censoring, and even blocking/defederating BIPOC members of the fediverse.

Which means when we talk about CWs, we have to talk about nuance. Intersectionality is complicated. Inclusion is messy.

When I ask people to make CWs on posts, I am asking people *with margin* to make space.

5/x

I am NOT asking marginalized people to self-censor. Those are very different things.

If you are speaking about your own lived experiences of marginalization, and a CW feels limiting, by all means post what you want to. I won't correct you. I won't mute you, or block you.

And that is easier for me to do with people with margin offer CWs on their activating content.

This is such an important distinction that generally does not show up in these discussions.

6/x

We can't talk about CWs as a way of making space for people without also acknowledging the ways they have been used to silence people.

And we can't ask for them to be used in our feeds unless we also do so with context and nuance that allows people to speak the truth about their own lives, especially across spectrums of race, ethnicity, ability, sexuality, gender, age. body shape, etc.

7/x

tl;dr - Be kind and believe people when they tell you about their own life experiences. I believe that posture leads to actions that help, without having to obsess over what the *specific* details of what posts need to be behind a CW.

8/8

@mike I think there's a wrong way to go about requesting a CW, and that leads to tone policing, silencing, etc. but the culture of CWs is by and for marginalized communities. It allows marginalized people to mentally prepare before engaging just as much as it allows you. And I've seen BIPOC who appreciate racism CWs for that reason.
I think we need to ask how do we combat the overly agressive response to BIPOC not CWing, rather than say no racism CWs.
@sleepysaf I never ask directly for a CW. I post my opinions about how to use CWs on my timeline, and then prune who I follow as needed.
@mike I found your thread helpful. Ty. Since starting here 5 wks ago CWs have been the most unfamiliar and, for me, non-intuitive change to get used to. There isn’t much that triggers or offends me, BUT I’ve had a mostly fortunate life. When my admin reminded us that election news stresses some and encouraged CWs I used them. Trying to be considerate. OTOH I use places like this & twitter to share sometimes strong opinions. I appreciate your nuanced thoughts
@steve_zeke Thank you for taking the time to parse through a long thread. :)

@mike @steve_zeke I agree with much of what you said, as much as my brain is capable of parsing it with my own mental struggles.

I have a very "you do you and I'll do me" like attitude to life. I'll try to lead by example where I can and I'll filter using the tools available to me and educate others, when it seems appropriate, on filtering to make their experience and everyone's better.

@mike My general rule is it is never my place to police a group that I do not belong to. If people in that group want CW on racism, or ableism, or transphobia -- the only people who have a right to ask for that is people who share that identity. NO ONE who doesn't share that identity should be butting in to say anything, imo.

I am also used to sharing stories about ableism openly in disability communities so I just... do that. It's a community norm.

@mike I don't think it's the place for a non-disabled person or someone who hasn't experienced ableist discrimination and harassment to tell me to CW my explanations of it. I'm trying to educate about how harmful it is and how it kills. I want people to be uncomfortable with it. That's the only way change happens. And anyone's discomfort at hearing about it doesn't trump my discomfort at experiencing it. Or the need for you to hear about it.
@mike If a disabled person told me to CW -- that's different completely. But my general rule is... if hearing about oppression of a group you don't belong to makes you feel uncomfortable and you want to be protected from hearing about it -- your priorities are wrong and your sense of what's salient is malfunctioning. A great way to not hear anymore about ableism, for example, is to work to end it. Something everyone is free to do.
@mike I feel like that is somewhat what you were getting at! But just wanted to share my perspective on it. I appreciate this post and your thoughtfulness on this.
@ahreaume I agree so deeply, and this is something that is somehow hard for people to understands--and then often angers them once they finally do.
@mike For those of us who are new to the Fediverse, can you recommend a good starting place (link?) to come up to speed on the social mores surrounding CWs and when they are appropriate, at least as a first-order approximation?
@mike You and I are white men. It would be very easy for us to demand content warnings as a way to opt-out of having to see posts by people less privileged or differently marginalised than ourselves. For my part, I'm not cool with that. I'll use content warnings for a lot of things, but not to hide discussions about xenophobia.
@BigNurseMike @mike So the issue of racism isn't even worth a warning? And by that I mean respect for those directly affected (BIPOC), who in the worst case are insulted or retraumatized again by the post of a "white man" (your words, not mine 🙃)? Even if that is not the intention, it can happen. The use of warnings by white people is also a protection for those affected. I can't understand why other issues (Mental Health) get consideration and this doesn't.
@mike @BigNurseMike PS: completely different issue if we are writing about our own experiences (like the original post stated).
@Novemberbeetle @mike If you're discussing a particular event that included violence then a content warning can be beneficial as a courtesy for traumatised people. Otherwise I think in the context of discussing racism the negative effect of a content warning outweighs the good. If you put discussions of systemic racism behind content warnings, a significant number of white people opt-out of reading them. That's obvious from the number of BiPoC people I've seen being chided for not doing it.
@BigNurseMike Respectfully, I have never demanded a CW form anyone, and I don't intend to in the future.
@mike No, but I am seeing an awful lot of white men telling people of colour to use content warnings when discussing racism, always citing hypothetical triggering of hypothetical other black people.
I've not yet seen a person of colour request a content warning because they, themselves are triggered.
Thus my strong belief that in this particular context, content warnings are being abused to allow white people to opt-out of uncomfortable truths.

@mike thanks Mike. You may help me with your reflections and structured thoughts to navigate relationships with other marginalized people, as living with cPT stressor-sensitivity and being in loaylty conflicts a lot: Loyal to my needs or the needs of the others? How/if to address? Also as a white person and always being a representative of the oppressive system - and for ever (at least in my lifespan) privileged by it.

Thx for sharing.

@mike Mike , in reference to an earlier staement of yours ,for someone who says he doesn't know what he's talking about ya make a lot of sense 😉👍🏿🤣🤣🤣

@mike
Thank you so much for directly addressing this issue. I'm a brown woman who literally got here yesterday, and thought I'd noticed this dynamic but obviously did not have enough information to confirm.

Addressing this issue thoughtfully and flexibly, and soon, is critical. I've already seen POCs and marginalized persons comment that they've been muted/silenced here. Striking a balance is necessary.

#Listening #Community #BrownPeople

@AliceAllonym Thank you for sharing your experiences with me,