This is a thread.

I left Twitter years ago because it a principal catalyst in destroying my mental health. I came back because I made my living on social media, largely by being a "bluecheck."

Going back was not great. Elon showing up to accidentally destroy it was the perfect moment for me to leave for good, so I did.

I set up a new Mastodon account on a new instance and had a great time with about 350 mutuals (people I followed that followed me as well).

1/X

I fell in love with Mastodon in this time. There wasn't a lot going on, so I could go days without checking in. It really helped me deal with compulsive cycles of social media usage.

But more than that, there was a culture around mental health here. People were intentional about not turning their feeds into a torrent of neurological activation. CWs offered a respite and became the norm because so many people here are disabled, queer, have mental illness, etc.

2/x

But, I also noticed despite all the intersections of identity that could function here in a way that could not on corporately controlled platforms, the Fediverse in general, and Mastodon in particular, were incredibly white.

That is always an alarm bell for me as someone who has committed their life to the work of antiracism.

3/x

The strange thing about Mastodon being so white the that the origins of the Fediverse, both in code and in culture, come from black, queer, and trans people.

So, being an autistic nerd, I started researching and studying. I took enormous effort to identity BIPOC across the fediverse and follow them, so I could learn about their unique experiences here.

I learned many things, but only one of the is directly salient to this thread.

4/x

CWs (Content Warnings) are the mechanism that allow me to function here with my mental health challenges. AND they are something that have been used to justify tone policing, censoring, and even blocking/defederating BIPOC members of the fediverse.

Which means when we talk about CWs, we have to talk about nuance. Intersectionality is complicated. Inclusion is messy.

When I ask people to make CWs on posts, I am asking people *with margin* to make space.

5/x

I am NOT asking marginalized people to self-censor. Those are very different things.

If you are speaking about your own lived experiences of marginalization, and a CW feels limiting, by all means post what you want to. I won't correct you. I won't mute you, or block you.

And that is easier for me to do with people with margin offer CWs on their activating content.

This is such an important distinction that generally does not show up in these discussions.

6/x

We can't talk about CWs as a way of making space for people without also acknowledging the ways they have been used to silence people.

And we can't ask for them to be used in our feeds unless we also do so with context and nuance that allows people to speak the truth about their own lives, especially across spectrums of race, ethnicity, ability, sexuality, gender, age. body shape, etc.

7/x

tl;dr - Be kind and believe people when they tell you about their own life experiences. I believe that posture leads to actions that help, without having to obsess over what the *specific* details of what posts need to be behind a CW.

8/8

@mike You and I are white men. It would be very easy for us to demand content warnings as a way to opt-out of having to see posts by people less privileged or differently marginalised than ourselves. For my part, I'm not cool with that. I'll use content warnings for a lot of things, but not to hide discussions about xenophobia.
@BigNurseMike @mike So the issue of racism isn't even worth a warning? And by that I mean respect for those directly affected (BIPOC), who in the worst case are insulted or retraumatized again by the post of a "white man" (your words, not mine 🙃)? Even if that is not the intention, it can happen. The use of warnings by white people is also a protection for those affected. I can't understand why other issues (Mental Health) get consideration and this doesn't.
@mike @BigNurseMike PS: completely different issue if we are writing about our own experiences (like the original post stated).
@Novemberbeetle @mike If you're discussing a particular event that included violence then a content warning can be beneficial as a courtesy for traumatised people. Otherwise I think in the context of discussing racism the negative effect of a content warning outweighs the good. If you put discussions of systemic racism behind content warnings, a significant number of white people opt-out of reading them. That's obvious from the number of BiPoC people I've seen being chided for not doing it.