📚 🔖  ✨
Starting a thread to share books and reading recommendations for all things pagan, witchy, and occult. Please respond to this post with any titles you'd recommend or want to share, and #boost for visibility. Bonus internet points if you include a summery or start a discussion about the reading materials too! 🤓  

#pagan #witch #witchy #wicca #magick #thelma #spirtuality #druid #tarot #astrology #heathen #KitchenWitch #occult #reading #BookList #MastodonReads #ReadingList #Recommendation #ff #followfriday

@Crazypedia Pictured here is my most recent reading material, the books that have re-activated my interest in the occult and ceremonial magic specifically.

I'll share my thoughts on the text below.
#pagan #magic #spirituality #planetarymagic #ceremonialmagic #occult #reading #BookList #MastodonReads #Recommendation #hermetic #ogdoatic

@Crazypedia I acquired "Planetary Magic" first, and that "IV" on the spine was driving me nuts for a bit, because it WASN'T originally published as a part of the series that it's now being included in. And the other three volumes were originally published as FIVE volumes. So it took a bit of research to make sure I had the complete set. Even the person at Llewellyn who responded to my inquiry got the list incorrect.

I'd never heard of Denning & Phillips before, but their approach to ceremonial magic feels very grounded and sane to me. It leans really heavily into the theurgy end of the theurgy/thaumaturgy spectrum, and favors a Jungian paradigm as the explanation for "why this stuff works".

I've looked around online for groups working with this material and have found a few. Interestingly, it seems like people have found some value in using the material in either pagan or Abrahamic frameworks. Most of the rituals included in the books include alternate versions so that use can Hebrew, Greek, or Enochian naming as you see fit.

In comparison to, say, Golden Dawn or Thelemic material that I've looked at over the years, there are two things that stand out about the exposition in these books. First, the authors are pretty up front that a practitioner is sooner than later going to be confronted with a need to do a bit of improvising with their ritual work. It's less didactic in that way. Second, their grasp of history as a scholarly discipline seems a bit stronger than many texts, although they still engage in a fair bit of reconstructive myth-making.

I'd actually be really interested to know what people working inside a more nature-oriented tradition would make of this stuff. The books struck me as potentially a useful starting point as a bridge for communication between the two communities.

I'm planning to begin working the material the very minute I get my working space back into suitable condition...currently it's a bit cluttered.

@Ipsifendus @Crazypedia I've only somewhat recently come across Denning & Philips as well, though I had heard of Aurum Solis in the past, at least passingly. Also started with the well-recommended (for good reason) Planetary Magick and just tracked down Foundations last week. The other two being still in print and easily accessible, I'll pick them up shortly. Was mostly focused on getting the order and titles correct, as it is rather confusing, and then on sourcing a copy of Foundations, which I have only just started to read. Just came in the post a few days ago. About to dive in.

I do *somewhat* come from a more nature-focused background and while I've gotten more into the sorcerous side of things in recent years, I do so far agree that this material might be a fantastic bridge for people from the two communities.

Just moved, so I too have no working space at this moment, but very much looking forward to digging my teeth into this material on a hands-on praxis level.

@elizadys @Crazypedia Wow...looks to me like I picked the right server here.

I'll be interested to hear how things go once you've put the material to use! I'd suggest comparing notes, but I'm badly out of practice, so I'm likely to be spending the next few weeks just working on basic techniques.

I saw that you're a fan of pulp illustrations...you might appreciate the goofy thing I picked up earlier today: Pulp Tarot!

@Ipsifendus @Crazypedia Oh, I have that deck! The creator did a really good job with it. I'm still getting to know its vibe, but so far it seems like it is pretty no-nonsense and doesn't pull punches.

It's okay, I too am out of practice after life stuff really getting in the way of most magical things the last many months. We can always compare notes in future!

@elizadys @Ipsifendus @Crazypedia I’ve got that deck, too—like it a lot! I’m getting that dry, wry, no-nonsense vibe as well. I did an Interview Your Deck type of spread with it and got the sense it didn’t want to be consulted on highly emotional matters. Using it for writing questions exclusively and it’s lively and great!
@tinarowley I've not done an interview spread with it (I should! Thank you for the reminder.) but it is true, it's really not down for any emo nonsense. LOL

@Ipsifendus @Crazypedia When I was putting together a course on planetary magic, I picked up the Denning & Phillips book, along with the Rankine & d'Este book "Practical Planetary Magick". Between the two, the latter was much shorter and easier to approach, so I didn't give D&P as much time as it deserved.

I just pulled D&P down off the shelf and it looks like it has a ton of amazing material. I am going to have to give it another try. Thanks for posting about it and prompting me to look at it again!

@arnemancy @Ipsifendus @Crazypedia The D'Este & Rankine one might be a bit of a better introductory primer. Their books tend to be like that: fact-packed, digestible. The D&P one is worth the price of admission just for the extensive correspondence tables, but then they also go on from there and get really interesting!
@elizadys @Ipsifendus @Crazypedia The correspondence tables look promising, but I already have so many planetary correspondence tables in Agrippa and Skinner and 777.