@richvn gosh, so much to respond to!
Favouriting doesn't do much here - it won't e.g. increase the likelihood of that toot being seen by others. It just lets the author know you liked it (and others that have stumbled upon the too)
No full-text search is a very intentional part of the design. Full-text search enabled and encouraged harrassment. Each user should do hashtags only if they want to encourage wide conversation. No hashtags enables a more limited/safe discussion
@richvn yeah, i guess 2012-2022 should be seen as the 'golden age' for journalism where journalists could just login to twitter, do a search and have abundant copy for any article or viewpoint of their choosing ;)
I guess journalists will have to be a bit more proactive and ask/approach people for comments again?
[none of this is a dig at you btw. But I think we've all seen on daily basis 'news' stories churned out from tweets, I won't be sad to see that go...]
@richvn agree. Full-text search was a double-edge sword. It did good too. Not just enabling harrassment.
hashtagged DOIs? I like it! Might try that out... quite hyperspecific though. A broader discipline based hashtag might bring a wider scope of potential engagement (if desired)
Gonna be fun trying all this stuff in the next few months and years!
testing testing (just to see how it handles slashes)...
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201617
#10.1098/rsos.201617 #JournalImpactFactor #Taxonomy #Zootaxa #Clarivate