So historians on here are calling themselves ‘histodons.’ Lit scholars, are we litodons, textodons, litaphants, booktodons, or something else altogether? The historians always get the best names (e.g. twitterstorians). 😤

#AcademicTwitter #AcademicChat #LitScholars #twitterstorians

@smaran That's a tough one! Donna literati? 🤣 what's the point of being a lit scholar if you can't muck with word order? (I am not one, so pay me no mind...)
@chiasm haha yes. Experts at coining words (as any Cultural Studies monograph will demonstrate).
@smaran librodons?
@smaran
just learned that astronomers have ‘astrodons’ here...
@tkinias love that for them. Rolls off the tongue.
@tkinias @smaran that here, that’s the winner. 100%.
@smaran Perhaps we should do this by subdisciplines: postcolonialdons, modernistadons, shakesadons, etc.
@smaran Probably not the most practical option, but I love the sound of litaphants.
@smaran @torstenkathke As an early modern scholar, I love that we could then say that Shakespeare is the litaphant in the room. Was always sort of envious about twitterstorians, we should use this as our chance to rebrand!
@susannegruss @smaran We need to meet soon so I can greet you with ”Ah yes, there they are, the litaphant in the room.“
@torstenkathke @smaran You just want to troll us poor #litodons from your seemingly superior #histodons hashtag position!
@susannegruss @smaran You know historians, we flocked to that one not without a fundamental discussion about whether this was a good hashtag, what makes a good hashtag, and why hashtags are, and have historically been. The controversy rages on. And I don’t troll unless it’s Moomin.
@smaran well, that makes me wonder if there is something like that for teachers…🤓
@smaran paleographers will be "manuscriptodons"
@smaran I think "litodons" feels most parallel, but my sleep-deproved brain has also prodiced such delights as "wordophants" and "narratodons" (not that everyone works with strictly 'narrative' material)