alt for @Torn on next tech book between TLS/Let's Encrypt and DNSSEC 2e. (Too early to do #ao3e, the market won't yet support it.)
DNSSEC2e
TLS/Let's Encrypt
screw tech, more orcs!
Poll ended at .
That one Jewish network nerd@mwlucas I voted my heart.
peter hessler @openbsd@mwlucas I like how the (current) results look like the poll is flipping you off
@phessler 
The rest of the world does, why shouldn't the poll get in on it as well?
The rest of the world does, why shouldn't the poll get in on it as well?
Bryce Chidester@mwlucas I feel that TLS/ACME/LE has a broader application ("know this one fundamental thing") and lower barrier to entry, that it fits better with the "IT Mastery" series theme.
That's not to say DNSSEC isn't also important, but I feel it's a more advanced topic with a lesser reward compared to getting people to use TLS and understand why they should use it.
Also, the number of DNSSEC-validating resolvers feels (subjectively) low, but all modern browsers check TLS and complain loudly.
@mwlucas Nevermind, found your FAQ! https://mwl.io/faq#books
BSDTV@mwlucas is it bad that I think all three seem valid/needed? Work-wise the first two would be a must-buy for me. Good luck!
abyxcos@mwlucas as an OpenBSD user who is still fighting with a weirder relayd TLS/LS config despite your httpd and relayd book, I would like to see a “missing chapters” that expands a bit on the relayd with let’s encrypt section, but I feel like that would make a better blarg post than a book.
Relayd has moved on from that book.
Really, there's no better way to spark development on a project than for me to write a book on it. 
Toby
David Cross