NEW by me:

While digging into the High Court of Bombay injunction sought by Global Schools Group (GSG) against FulcrumSec that I reported yesterday, I discovered a second injunction filed by a Singapore court.

Two injunctions in two countries in 24 hours.

Each one was worded somewhat differently and listed different defendants or respondents.

As an odd note: it appears that GSG's law firm may have forgotten to send FulcrumSec the Bombay court injunction of June 12 until after I reported on it yesterday. FulcrumSec had received the Singapore injunction on June 13, but knew nothing about any other injunction until I asked them about it yesterday. Less than 24 hours after I published about the Bombay injunction, the law firm sent it to FulcrumSec along with the attached files that the threat actors have now shared with me.

But what did these injunctions actually accomplish? Read my new post:

Global Schools Group Obtained Two Court Injunctions That Didn’t Seem to Change Much—and Might Backfire

https://databreaches.net/2026/06/20/global-schools-group-obtained-two-court-injunctions-that-didnt-seem-to-change-much-and-might-backfire/

@zackwhittaker @campuscodi @amvinfe

#FulcrumSec #GlobalSchoolsGroup #GIIS #injunction #databreach #hackandleak #extortion #chillingeffects #pressfrredom #legalthreats #censorship