Antonis CharitonAnother great reason why IPv6 is bad:
https://community.ntppool.org/t/the-time-has-come-we-must-enable-ipv6-entirely/1968/5
> if your NIC is replaced it gets a new IP
> almost nobody understands it or can explain it
> IPv6 is stupid and it will die soon
> Almost nobody uses it
Luckily, there’s a solution!
> Time for IPv4+, keep the current but just add a few more numbers, or change them from 256 to max 1024
> I never understood why they didn’t simply make more numbers and keep what we have.
The time has come: we must enable IPv6 entirely
I have played with IPv6 but it’s a bad design, because if your NIC is replaced it gets a new IP and you can change all records again. I tried to understand the stupid protocol but it makes no sense. They should bury it and let people decide if they want NAT or not as today you can not use NAT and that means that every change in your local network, you have to do a lot of work to get things back to working order again. I stopped trying to understand it, as it seems almost nobody understands it...
MasterOhado
