Perhaps this is already well known to
#historians of the
#ColdWar and
#nuclear #weapons, but in case it isn’t, the “teeny tiny itsy bitsy cutie pie tactical nuclear weapon” paper contains this data point:
#HistSciTech #war #military #history
RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:l5qgtdxd462q6cz5hbt25edk/post/3mefv7ab6c223On 15 Nov 1988, 37 years ago, the
#Soviet #space #shuttle #Buran made its first and only flight.
In 2013, I found an interesting piece of
#history of the
#ColdWar and wrote why Buran looked like a copy of the US Shuttle. (TL;DR: arms race/paranoia.)
#HistSciTech
jmkorhonen.net/2013/11/18/s...Space system “Shuttle,” part o...
Space system “Shuttle,” part of USA’s nuclear attack arsenal?
The story of a white elephant colloquially known as the Space Shuttle is familiar to most students of the history of technology. The shuttle was originally touted as a cheap way to access space: …
The unpublished notebooks of J. M. KorhonenSimilar widespread ignorance of
#history of
#technology among technologists, even of one's own field, infuriated me when I was doing engineer things in product development in the late 00's.
I saw it lead to 1) avoidable mistakes and 2) pernicious beliefs of superiority. 1/
#STS #HistSciTech
RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:iyz5zf463ic52vqbonyu2ebu/post/3lul2emazrs2cConsidering the vastly different population densities, this is an eyebrow-raising figure:
"Germany had 18,242 windmills in 1895 ... and Finland had 20,000 windmills in 1900."
Any
#histscitech or
#energyhistory peeps who'd like to weigh in?
solar.lowtechmagazine.com/2009/10/wind...Wind Powered Factories: Histor...
Wind Powered Factories: History (and Future) of Industrial Windmills
Would it make sense to revive the industrial windmill and again convert kinetic energy directly into mechanical energy?
LOW←TECH MAGAZINEWhat the 2000s looked like during the last hurrah of Cold War's infinite defence spend / cocaine supply: a proposal for a "Post 2000 era" "Manned Space Battle Cruiser" from a c. 1983 report
ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19... #HistSciTech #space
Advanced beamed-energy and field propulsion concepts - NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS)
Specific phenomena which might lead to major advances in payload, range and terminal velocity of very advanced vehicle propulsion are studied. The effort focuses heavily on advanced propulsion spinoffs enabled by current government-funded investigations in directed-energy technology: i.e., laser, microwave, and relativistic charged particle beams. Futuristic (post-year 2000) beamed-energy propulsion concepts which indicate exceptional promise are identified and analytically investigated. The concepts must be sufficiently developed to permit technical understanding of the physical processes involved, assessment of the enabling technologies, and evaluation of their merits over conventional systems. Propulsion concepts that can be used for manned and/or unmanned missions for purposes of solar system exploration, planetary landing, suborbital flight, transport to orbit, and escape are presented. Speculations are made on the chronology of milestones in beamed-energy propulsion development, such as in systems applications of defense, satellite orbit-raising, global aerospace transportation, and manned interplanetary carriers.
Found an open version of one of the greatest papers in the history of science, technology and innovation ever written: Ogburn and Thomas's "Are Inventions Inevitable" from 1922 (!).
It's short and well written: Do yourself a favor and read it.
#HistSciTech #STS
archive.org/stream/jstor...archive.org/stream/jstor-2...