Sốc: YouTube & Apple “Ngó lơ” Hàng Triệu Nội Dung Bạo Lực Trẻ Em?!

Sốc: YouTube & Apple "Ngó lơ" Hàng Triệu Nội Dung Bạo Lực Trẻ Em?! #YouTube #Apple #AnToanTreEm #BaoLucTreEm #eSafety #CongNghe #SoiMoiCongNghe #TinTucCongNghe Trong một báo cáo gây chấn động dư luận được công bố hôm 6/8, Ủy ban An toàn điện tử (eSafety) của Australia đã chỉ trích mạnh mẽ YouTube và Apple vì sự thiếu sót nghiêm trọng trong việc xử lý nội dung bạo lực tình dục trẻ em trên các nền tảng…

https://maychu.top/2025/08/14/soc-youtube-apple-ngo-lo-hang-trieu-noi-dung-bao-luc-tre-em/

“Australia’s #OnlineSafetyChief has warned the #Albanese government of the imminent “ground war” by #tech giants harnessing “the most famous #influencers” before a #SocialMedia ban for under-16s later this year.

#AnthonyAlbanese announced in July the government’s decision to include YouTube in the #restrictions set to begin from December, reversing an earlier decision to exempt the video platform.

The decision followed advice from the #eSafety commissioner, #JulieInmanGrant, that its exclusion was inconsistent with the law’s intention given it had similar functionality to other social media sites, such as #TikTok and #Instagram.

In emails to the communication minister’s office, Inman Grant said she anticipated the laws would invoke a “#lobbying surge” brought on by concerns the ban would affect #AdvertisingRevenue, a trove of newly released documents tabled in the #Senate on Wednesday show.”

The “influencers” 🤣

#AusPol / #labor / #politics / #OnlineSafteyAct / #OAS / #UK / #AUS / #BigTech / #censorship <https://theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/aug/13/influencers-wage-ground-war-australian-government-over-social-media-ban-documents-reveals>

Famous influencers to wage ‘ground war’ on Australian government over social media ban, documents reveal

Julie Inman Grant said the laws would provoke a ‘lobbying surge’ brought on by concerns the ban would affect advertising revenue

The Guardian
No, the UK’s Online Safety Act Doesn’t Make Children Safer Online

Young people should be able to access information, speak to each other and to the world, play games, and express themselves online without the government making decisions about what speech is permissible. But in one of the latest misguided attempts to protect children online, internet users of all...

Electronic Frontier Foundation

“The way we use the #internet in #Australia is changing. Soon, it won’t just be social media platforms asking to verify your age. Come December, #AgeVerification requirements will also extend to search engines – with significant ramifications.

That means you may need to *scan your face* or do an *identity check* to use a search engine as a logged-in user. And it’s unlikely to stop there: the #eSafety commissioner is considering rules for #mandatory #AgeChecks across the entire internet landscape.

Whether or not you support the idea of age-gating the internet, this is a huge, unprecedented change. These are not small decisions; they will impact everyone who uses the internet in Australia – not just people under 16. There are implications for privacy, digital inclusion, access to information and online participation that go beyond the controversial *teen social media ban*. All of this warrants meaningful public debate.”

#AusPol / #labor / #politics <https://theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/jul/23/new-rules-will-radically-change-the-way-we-use-the-internet-in-australia-and-not-just-social-media>

Age verification is coming to search engines in Australia – with huge implications for privacy and inclusion

New rules will radically change the way we use the internet in Australia, and not just social media

The Guardian

Australians will soon need their age checked to log into online search tools – here’s why

Australians will soon need their age checked to log into... #australia #esafety

https://theconversation.com/australians-will-soon-need-their-age-checked-to-log-into-online-search-tools-heres-why-260199

Australians will soon need their age checked to log into online search tools – here’s why

Before December search engines such as Google will need to implement several other measures aimed at protecting children online.

The Conversation

"higher daily hours spent on YouTube is associated with greater symptoms of depression"

If depressed people watch #YouTube , then banning it means kids can't get depressed anymore right?

#eSafety commissioner really reaching to justify these bans

#under16socialMediaBan #auspol

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/jun/25/should-youtube-be-included-in-australias-under-16s-social-media-ban-heres-what-you-need-to-know

Should YouTube be included in Australia’s under-16s social media ban? Here’s what you need to know

The video platform previously had a carve out in the November draft legislation but the online safety regulator has recommended it be included in the ban

The Guardian

#eSafety is requesting feedback from the community and industry on its social media age restrictions regime. Amongst the feedback they are seeking they are looking for possible impacts on privacy and digital rights.

From a digital rights point of view, having more companies involved in age assurance and proliferation of online identification harms users for multiple reasons. We made a submission on this last year and do not support the regime. We intend to make a submission to eSafety representing our ongoing concerns.

What might a private age assurance regime look like, that has some semblance of concern for users' rights online? Perhaps something like Privacy Pass would be worth a look, an IETF-proposed web-capable standard for unlinkable authenticator tokens. Kagi is using this as an option for users to pay for access to its search engine whilst using the service anonymously. Social media operates under a much different model to search where users authenticate to a service and pull down a feed. A Privacy Pass token might allow a pseudonymous user to prove their age without creating a link to their identity.

https://privacypass.github.io/

Some pretty major downsides include significant complexity in implementing such a scheme including multiple independent parties, a requirement for involved users to use a browser plugin and would ultimately still require users to authenticate somewhere for the purposes of age assurance. It seems unlikely that many users would take up such a scheme, opting for a more convenient scan of an ID photo and/or selfies if such a method was offered.

What might a "less bad" age assurance regime look like? Having a lot of options for users to verify their age would be one. A failure could see users being locked out of their accounts. This is age assurance, not identification, and should be treated as such. Organisations that provide age assurance services should be restricted in what they can use the data for and how long it is retained.

Let us know your thoughts on age assurance and how it would impact privacy and digital rights online.

Privacy Pass

Privacy Pass

A U.S. judge has overturned an Arkansas law that required #ageverification from all users for online safety citing restrictions on protected speech.

The law "was so vague it was unclear which social networks the law would cover". Sound familiar? The Online Safety Amendment in Australia is quite vague too, potentially applying to any service that allows communication between users. The Australian Communications Minister proposed a "sweetheart deal" for YouTube exempting it from the rules (perhaps YouTube and Google already know enough about their users...)

What impact will such legislation have on the Fediverse? EFA would like to see a broad exemption for digital communities that are not profit-based to avoid any chilling effects on Australian communities and operators, among other exemptions and wider concerns with regards to the legislation.

Australia does not have protected speech like the U.S. does, but we can draw on experiences from other countries and pay attention to both safety and human rights concerns.

https://gizmodo.com/arkansas-judge-kills-social-media-age-verification-law-says-it-violates-the-first-amendment-2000583628

#privacy #esafety #electronicfrontiersaustralia

Arkansas Judge Kills Social Media Age Verification Law, Says It Violates the First Amendment

“Arkansas takes a hatchet to adults’ and minors’ protected speech alike though the Constitution demands it use a scalpel,” the judge said.

Gizmodo

✉️🔐 Jak Telegram podle úřadu eSafety moderuje nelegální obsah?

🔗 https://infoek.cz/jak-telegram-podle-uradu-esafety-moderuje-nelegalni-obsah-2025/

#Telegram #eSafety

Jak Telegram podle úřadu eSafety moderuje nelegální obsah? – Infoek.cz