I was reminiscing earlier about how my Sanskrit tests had bonus questions with sentences that you wouldn't expect. Example:
"The giraffe ate the king."
You'd expect it to go the other way around.
Now, let's assume a text was written in a way that was deliberately designed to shock the reader. Maybe in this text, giraffes really ate kings.
Now think about the scribes that copied this text. Would they read about the king-eating giraffes and decide that a fly had been squished in the wrong spot on the manuscript? Let's correct this. "The king ate the giraffe." There!
I can also imagine us in the West when we receive these texts, wanting to do the most charitable reading of the text, and ending up "correcting" things that don't need correction.
Note that I have no proof that this happened, no idea, nothing. I'm just engaging in a thought experiment.
What if some old sage took some psychedelic substance, had a trip and dictated his trip to a scribe? How much "sanitization" would the scribe do, and then later copyists, and then us?
#manuscripts #scribes #copyists #antiquity