Deyan GinevRE: https://mathstodon.xyz/@dginev/116023772616082938
ποΈ The February 2026 arXiv articles are now in ar5iv.
RE: https://mathstodon.xyz/@dginev/115849555467105638
ποΈ The January 2026 arXiv articles are now in ar5iv.
RE: https://mathstodon.xyz/@dginev/115670686807382463
ποΈ The December 2025 arXiv articles are now in ar5iv.
Meanwhile, the arXiv HTML conversion worker was updated on Dec 17th, its third and final update in 2025.
Happy new year!
RE: https://mathstodon.xyz/@dginev/115500903499229848
ποΈ The November 2025 arXiv articles are now in ar5iv.
I got curious, so here are some recent papers using ar5iv data:
Connected Theorems: A Graph-Based Approach to Evaluating Mathematical Results
https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.17596
SciGA: A Comprehensive Dataset for Designing Graphical Abstracts in Academic Papers
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.02212
ChatPD: An LLM-driven Paper-Dataset Networking System
https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.22349
PaSa: An LLM Agent for Comprehensive Academic Paper Search
https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.10120
Connected Theorems: A Graph-Based Approach to Evaluating Mathematical Results
The evaluation of mathematical results plays a central role in assessing researchers' contributions and shaping the direction of the field. Currently, such evaluations rely primarily on human judgment, whether through journal peer review or committees at research institutions. To complement these traditional processes, we propose a data-driven approach. We construct a hierarchical graph linking theorems, papers, and fields to capture their citation relationships. We then introduce a PageRank-style algorithm to compute influence scores for these entities. Using these scores, we analyze the evolution of field rankings over time and quantify the impact between fields. We hope this framework can contribute to the development of more advanced, quantitative methods for evaluating mathematical research and serve as a complement to expert assessment.