For North America folks interested in low-maintenance, accurate atomic/radio clocks, but live outside the expected WWVB range¹ :

The La Crosse UltrAtomic large wall clock has a semi-novel internal two-antenna design that allows the WWVB signal to be picked up at greater distances (such as southcentral Alaska) when conditions are favorable (especially at night).

And since the modern WWVB signal² embeds DST/ leap seconds / etc well in advance of actual changes, and since the oscillator is relatively low drift ... the time accuracy window is pretty robust.

It takes either two or four D batteries. Four will get you around four years of life in ANC (in my experience).

So between the self-setting and the long battery life .... you can put a visible, affordable, low-maintenance clock in a hard-to-reach place, even in Alaska.

And here's a great teardown for the geeks:
http://leapsecond.com/pages/ultratomic/

(not affiliated or compensated, just a fan!)

¹‍https://tf.nist.gov/stations/wwvbcoverage.htm
²‍https://www.nist.gov/publications/wwvb-time-signal-broadcast-new-enhanced-broadcast-format-and-multi-mode-receiver

#WWVB #Alaska #TimeNut

Inside the La Crosse 1235UA UltrAtomic Radio Controlled WWVB (Atomic) Wall Clock

Lately I've been looking at my #NTP #rrdtool graphs more often because I switched the NTP implementation on my #FreeBSD server from #ntpd to #chrony. Overall, I'm quite impressed with chrony - although it seems to be so good I wonder if I'm plotting comparable data. :) #timenut

Last week, I did a major OS upgrade and replaced a dumb switch with a managed one and set up LACP. Doing this however seems to result in weird latency/time offset spikes. Unplugging one of the two members cleans it up.

@peeja The only beautiful frequencies are "50" because I'm in Europe and "10000000.000" because so much is locked to grid (and grid performance) and the second number is what I want my reference oscillator to present in my frequency counter display...

I think we agree, because those are simply conventions that have become targets worth attaining and not inherently beautiful. Also, the more floating point precision the second has, the better it is, making it non-int. Rounding to int devalues it.
#timenut