The brief and rather peculiar history of the rise of the idea of the "self-organising network".
A very powerful ideology of our time is the idea of the "self-organising network".
It says that human beings can organise themselves into systems where they are linked, but where there is no #hierarchy, no #leaders and no #control.
It is not the old form of collective action that the left once believed in, where people subsumed themselves into the greater force of the movement.
Instead all the individuals in the self-organising network can do whatever they want as creative, autonomous, self-expressive entities, yet somehow, through #feedback between all the individuals in the system, a kind of order emerges.
At its heart it says that you can organise human beings without the exercise of power by leaders.
As a political position it is obviously very irritating for TV interviewers, which may or may not be a good thing. And it doesn't necessarily mean it isn't a valid way for organising protests – and possibly even human society.
Of course some of the ideas come out of anarchist thought.
But the idea is also deeply rooted in a strange fantasy vision of nature that emerged in the 1920s and 30s as the British Empire began to decline.
It was a vision of nature and – ultimately – the whole world as a giant system that could #stabilise itself.
And it rose up to grip the imagination of those in power – and is still central in our culture.
But we have long forgotten where it came from.
To discover this you have to go back to a ferocious battle between two driven men in the 1920s.
One was a botanist and Fabian socialist called #Arthur #Tansley.
The other was one of the most powerful and ruthless rulers of the British Empire, Field Marshal #Jan #Smuts...
How the 'ecosystem' myth has been used for sinister means
When, in the 1920s, a botanist and a field marshal dreamed up rival theories of nature and society, no one could have guessed their ideas would influence the worldview of 70s hippies and 21st-century protest movements. But their faith in self-regulating systems has a sinister history, film-maker Adam Curtis explains