Avi Lewis is smart to shed light on surveillance pricing

If surveillance pricing seems invasive, that's because it is. It's predicated on the ability to take all sorts of your personal data that you did not openly consent to being used against you to get the maximum price for a company charging you for a good or service.

Canada's National Observer

When I try to discourage my family to use discount apps I realise that there is no awareness of what kind of data can be inferred by tying their shopping to an app that identifies you. And I'm having a tough time convincing them that "they'll just know I buy nuts in bulk when they are on sale" is false, they know so much more if you shop there regularly!

How can I make them see that this is a bad thing? It seems too abstract to be conceived as dangerous? Any advice?

#surveillancecapitalism

"[Y]our burnout, your lack of influence, your sense that the discipline has lost its way are not evidence of your individual shortcomings but symptoms of a system working exactly as it is designed to work."

In this poignant essay (linked below), Angelos Arnis describes the state of design in the age of AI. But it didn't start with AI...

"[T]he institutional arrangements within which design operates are configured to extract design's value while withholding design's autonomy and authority..."

Folks like Mike Monteiro, Erika Hall, Aral Balkan, and Laura Kalbag opened my eyes to this dynamic around 2014/2015. It started as a call to action for us designers to own the ethics of what we do, challenge expoitative business models, and 'do no harm.'

But I've long felt that the game is rigged against us on this. Angelos says this:

"The more I look at the state of tech, the more I recognize a specific structure operating in two distinct ways: the way business absorbs design's attempts at strategic influence, and the way AI tools absorb designers' labor while promising to liberate it."

Still, some designers manage to ake meaningful change, despite the obstacles:

"The designer who can navigate an organization that does not grant them autonomy and still produces meaningful work is doing something admirable. But the skill being developed is the skill of operating within someone else's terms."

I agree. And I realize that it's not easy to resist pressure from your boss, manager, or PM to just design the thing and not ask too many questions. We need to earn a living, right?

So we get beautifully designed products that effectively encourage behavior change that ultimately exploits the product's users to benefit the company that makes it. We get surveillance capitalism, predatory social media platforms, and tech products that enable fascist governments.

But I don't blame designers. I don't even blame the decision-makers who got us here. They are, indeed we all are, just humans doing our best. And most of us are too busy, burned out, or stuck in survival mode to feel the proverbial water heating up around us.

Also, people AI make very seductive promises about AI while convincing us that it's inevitable. Angelos says this:

"The technology generates a feeling of individual empowerment while producing deeper informal dependence. You feel more capable, yet you are truly more depending than ever."

So in Angelos' words, "How might we design the structures that would make design's autonomy a material reality rather than a perpetual aspiration?"

🤷🏼‍♂️ What do you think?

Thanks for reading, dear one! And thank you Matthijs for sharing this with me!

Here's the essay:
👉🏼 https://d3e.co/y5

With love and light,
Brian

#design #designers #business #AI #ethics #EthicalDesign #HumanConnection #DesignCommunity #MeaningfulDesign #ChangeManagement #SurveillanceCapitalism #fascism

Design was never the bottleneck

Design knows how to make things that do not yet exist. The work ahead may be to apply that capacity to the profession's own institutional life

our collective futures

@heisec

"Zudem spielt Instagram solche #Werbung auch an Kontakte von Nutzern aus, von denen das Unternehmen glaubt, dass sie ebenfalls an den Produkten interessiert sein könnten, erklärt #AdamMosseri weiter. Das basiere darauf, was ihre Freunde interessiert oder was Menschen mit ähnlichen Interessenprofilen derzeit spannend finden."

Schön, wenn der Freundeskreis Werbung für #Hämorrhoidensalbe kriegen, weil man selbst danach gesucht hat!

#surveillanceCapitalism #privacy #haemorrhoid

Keep Android Open

Your phone is about to stop being yours. In September 2026, Google will block every Android app whose developer hasn't registered with them.

RE: https://mastodon.hongkongers.net/@cbcnb_mirror/116240918136048249

I'm one of those pesky holdouts. Do I want the absolute clowns at the head of NB Power having real-time access to my energy consumption? Absothefucklutely not!

Every "development" from nbp over the last decade has turned out to be a grift. They have wasted tens - maybe hundreds of millions of grifts, many millions more on funding dictators, and BILLIONS sunk into our #nuclear plant because they wouldn't listen to the experts about maintenance.

Take for instance Joi Scientific - the "perpetual energy" company nbp partnered with in order to buy yachts for conmen. Or how about the not one but TWO companies they spun up to "build" #smr (small modular nuclear reactors).

Buffoons!

There was of course the deal with the dictators of Venezuela to run our #HeavyFuelOil power plant on some proprietary product on a 25 year agreement, rather than invest in renewables.

nbp doesn't own a single windfarm, and has gone out of their way to make it harder for wind project to take root.

Losers!

Despite this, we have about 400MW of wind online - the majority of this has local #Indigenous groups as the majority investors.

nbp keeps fighting in court to extend the life of our #coal buring power plant (!!!) past 2030. And losing.

nbp is absolutely desperate for money and the government board is actually doing a pretty good job of protecting the citizens by constantly denying nbp's rate increase asks. There is NO WAY they are not going to sell our data to anyone who will give them a nickle.

Day after day, year after year, we not only let these incompetent and dangerous people poison us and waste ungodly sums of money... we're paying them millions of dollars to do so.

#nbPower #SurveillanceCapitalism #OilLobby

When you thought #meta could not get more dystopic and they beg to prove you wrong 🥶

Feels deserved fate for the employees though. They helped turn humanity into a product to enrich themselves, now they are being turned into product themselves 😡

#dystopia
#surveillancecapitalism

https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/meta-start-capturing-employee-mouse-movements-keystrokes-ai-training-data-2026-04-21/

@ScottGrimmett

This might be exceedingly idealistic. Going "rogue" would be strange for a company of that size, which depends on the government in countless ways.

The real moral failure of Apple under Tim Cook, imho, concerns choices much more under their control. Despite marketing talk pitching #dataprivacy, they simply became an adjunct to #surveillancecapitalism

In a sense Apple became an oversized Mozilla. An entity that provides a fig leaf to cover digital dystopia.

@jfmezei
@rbreich

THIS! Is scary as sh*t!

**A 770% surge in government requests to Big Tech is reshaping parenting**

https://proton.me/blog/big-tech-government-requests-parenting

And I don't think this is just hitting 'parenting' only, but is much broader. It's about *everybody.* Shocking was that FISA (US foreign intelligence) has encountered a nearly 25x increase in the last 11 years. And it's only to get worse.

#BigTech is **NOT** your friend!

This is an analysis written up by @protonprivacy

A comment on this analysis is also quite interesting (from the 'parent' angle):

> As parents, we install baby gates and childproof our homes to protect what matters most. But one of the biggest risks our kids face today isn’t physical, it’s digital, and often left wide open.

#SurveillanceCapitalism #privacy #parenting #sharenting #SocialMedia